Skip to content

· Public charity

Mosdos Sanz of Monsey

The school is a private school that provides students with a jewish education in accordance with the sanz sect of orthodox jewry.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.2MInternational$825kHuman Services$629kReligion$474kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $37,444, the rows itemized in this filing. The $41,444 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$23,864
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS SMALL AMOUNTS$23,864
THE DONORS FUND$13,580
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $629k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AHAVAT YIROEL HUMANITY: $629k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 3 repeat orgs$718k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$694k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-20%

Still filing today

33%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $825k · revenue +44%
  • TT
    TALMUD TORAH DARKEI AVOS - MONSEY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $205k
  • CD
    CONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ OF BP
    2× · 2021–2022 · $204k

Funded once

  • AY
    AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $629k · revenue -20%
  • CC
    CONG CHASIDEI BOBOV OF MONSEY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BJ
    BETH JOEL
    one grant, 2018 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONORS FUND INC: $1,188,580 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INCAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC: $825,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ I…AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $628,600 · Human ServicesAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANIT…TALMUD TORAH DARKEI AVOS - MONSEY: $205,000 · OtherTALMUD TORAH DARK…CONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ OF BP: $204,000 · OtherCONGREGATION DARK…CONG CHASIDEI BOBOV OF MONSEY: $25,000 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL AMOUNTS: $23,864 · OtherBETH JOEL: $17,280 · Other+2 more: $23,130 · Other
Philanthropy$1,188,580International$825,000Human Services$628,600Other$498,274

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORS FUND INC: $1,188,580 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC: $825,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $628,600 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc · Donors Fund Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mosdos Sanz of Monsey funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mosdos Sanz of Monsey. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mosdos Sanz of Monsey?

    Find your warmest path to Mosdos Sanz of Monsey through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mosdos Sanz of Monsey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph