· Public charity
American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc
To provide financial support to the various charitable activities, programs, and projects conducted and administrated in the united states of america and in the state of israel.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $509,195 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,132,823 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,623,628 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $154k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $355k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC | $248,555 |
| FRIENDS OF HARIM INC | $106,900 |
| KOLLELEI HASHAS INC | $48,960 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEFA CHAIM VRACHAMIM | $42,000 |
| CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED | $25,500 |
| CONGREGATION ADAS CHASIDIM INC | $24,280 |
| MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY | $13,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $2.6M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TO PROMOTE RELIGIOUS AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE STATE OF ISRAEL
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +108% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AYAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC3× · 2017–2024 · $659k · revenue +678%
- AFAmerican Friends of Shefa Chaim Vrachami m2× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +247% · 70% of their budget
- FOFRIENDS OF HARIM INC2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- CDCONGREGATION DARKEI AVOS SANZ OF BPone grant, 2019 · $712k
- CMCONGREGATION MAHARI SRUG INCone grant, 2023 · $500k
- KMKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & Trustone grant, 2023 · $400k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide grants to jewish religious organization in need.
To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.
Education and religious activities and research
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.
To provide financial support to Yeshivat Orchot Torah, an educational institution located in Israel, and to other educational institutions of higher learning in the U.S. and Israel
Furtherance of jewish education
The purpose of Birkat Haaretz is to promote the laws of shmitta accordance to Jewish law.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc and the most unlike its peers is Katten Muchin Rosenman Llp Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Employees' Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Shefa Chaim Vrachami m ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HARIM INC ↗
- Who funds EZRAT ACHIM FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Biala Institutions of Bnei Brak Israel ↗
- Who funds JEWISH LIFELINE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Rostrust Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Mosdos Sanz of Monsey · Zcm Foundation Trust · The Margareten Family Foundation · American Friends of Rct Inc · Igcf Inc · Vyazreim Inc · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.