Skip to content
Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem Inc

To foster, promote and advance theological torah study, charity, and practice of orthodox judaism worldwide.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$406k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MPhilanthropy$794kHuman Services$125kHealth$690
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $1,396,934, the rows itemized in this filing. The $11,567,602 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,170,668 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $611k
  • $250k+2 grants · $667k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH$406,131
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH$260,500
YESHIVA KETANA$248,768
BNOS PEREL$107,600
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PNEI M$105,000
KOLLEL PNEI MENACHEM$94,150
CONG KNESSET SIMCHA$55,000
ZICHRON CHAIM SHLOMO INC$35,980
KEREN SHIVIM$26,500
ZECHER AVRAHAM INC$20,000
CONG KOLEL OHEL YESOCHOR D$10,000
CONG BNEI LUZER INC$9,875
YAD LACHMU ANYU$5,000
CONG MARIV BIHIDUR INC$4,500
CONG ZICHRON AVROHOM$3,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YESHIVA KETANA: $249k → 11%DAAS MEISHARIM: $140k → 13%CONG LEV SIMCHAH: $13k → 14%ZICHRON AHARON: $6k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS-TELZ STON: $17k → 11%YESHIVA KTANA INC: $35k → 11%DAAS MEISHARIM: $54k → 13%YESHIVA YESHUOIS MOSHE VIZ: $2k → 14%CONG KNESSET SIMCHA: $55k → 20%BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $300 → 11%DAAS MEISHARIM: $9k → 13%CONG KNESSET SIMCHA: $11k → 20%YAD LACHMU ANYU: $5k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $406k → 20%ZECHER AVROHOM INC: $108k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PNEI M: $105k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH: $331k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $67k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH: $261k → 20%KEREN SHIVIM: $27k → 20%KOLLEL PNEI MENACHEM: $94k → 20%ZECHER AVRAHAM INC: $20k → 20%BINYAN YERUSHLAIM: $37k → 20%ZECHER AVROHOM INC: $17k → 20%CONG KOLEL OHEL YESOCHOR D: $10k → 20%CONG MARIV BIHIDUR INC: $5k → 20%CONG BNEI LUZER INC: $10k → 20%GREATER BETH HATZLOCHO INC: $4k → 20%KOLEL PNEI MENACHEM: $4k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $3k → 20%YESHIVA OHL HATORAH: $4k → 20%CONG LOMDEI TORAH: $2k → 20%CONG ZICHRON AVROHOM: $3k → 20%CONG MEOR YISROEL: $1k → 20%TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF: $500 → 20%MIFAL CHESED INC: $690 → 20%BNOS PEREL: $108k → 20%ZICHRON CHAIM SHLOMO INC: $36k → 20%BNOS PEREL: $14k → 20%BAIS TZIPORAH: $3k → 20%NESIVOS BAIS YAAKOV: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 8 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$2.0M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+26%

Still filing today

38%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $592k · revenue 0%
  • YY
    YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $476k
  • YK
    YESHIVA KTANA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $284k

Funded once

  • BY
    BINYAN YERUSHLAIM
    one grant, 2021 · $37k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue +26%
  • CL
    CONGREGATION LEV SIMCHA
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $476,451 · OtherYESHIVA YAGDIL TORAHYESHIVA KTANA INC: $283,768 · OtherYESHIVA KTANA INCBNOS PEREL: $121,200 · OtherBNOS PERELKOLEL PNEI MENACHEM: $98,150 · OtherKOLEL PNEI MENACHEMCONGREGATION KNESST SIMCHA: $66,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KNESST SIMCHA+19 more: $166,925 · Other+19 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $591,791 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVADAAS MEISHARIM: $202,705 · PhilanthropyDAAS MEISHARIMAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PNEI MENACHEM INC: $105,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PNEI MENACHEM INCZECHER AVROHOM INC: $145,100 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $17,000 · Education+1 more: $300 · Education
Other$1,212,494Philanthropy$899,496Religion$145,100Education$17,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $591,791 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetDAAS MEISHARIM: $202,705 over 3y, 29% of budgetZECHER AVROHOM INC: $145,100 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PNEI MENACHEM INC: $105,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds DAAS MEISHARIM ↗
  • Who funds ZECHER AVROHOM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PNEI MENACHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundZecher Avrohom IncPark Charitable TrustAhavat Yisroel Humani…Friends of Mosdot GoorAmerican Friends of S…Westlawn FoundationAlternative Energy Fo…Mosdos Pnei Menachem …Eastlawn FoundationChaim Maleh FoundationJewish Communal Fund
The Ojc FundNY37.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Park Charitable Trust · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc · Friends of Mosdot Goor · American Friends of Sfath Emeth Yeshiva · Westlawn Foundation · Alternative Energy Foundation · Mosdos Pnei Menachem Inc · Eastlawn Foundation · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mosdos Hatorah Vhachesed of Pnei Menachem’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home