Skip to content
Mosaic at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mosaic

Embracing god's call, MOSAIC relentlessly pursues opportunities that empower people.

$658k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$790kHuman Services$34k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $450,274, the rows itemized in this filing. The $657,672 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $207,398 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $247k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $156k
$17,660
Median grant
1
States reached
$261M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP II$96,700
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVIII - OSCEOLA-WAUKON$58,900
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XV - COUNCIL BLUFFS$45,808
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVII - BEATRICE$43,390
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XII$31,983
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIX - WINFIELD$28,500
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XXII - LOGAN$21,890
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP IX$19,900
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP X$17,660
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP VIII$13,963
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP VII$12,500
MOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING OF ROCKFORD I$11,000
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XI$9,080
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP I$9,000
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIII$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING CORP II: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $202k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$202k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT OF SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES. CENTER-BASED AND IN-HOME SUPPORT FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES AND THEIR CAREGIVERS.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$638k · 12 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$638k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+258%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Housing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MOSAIC HOUSING CORP II
    7× · 2018–2025 · $152k · revenue +159% · 45% of their budget
  • MH
    MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVIII - OSCEOLA-WAUKON
    6× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +17% · 71% of their budget
  • MH
    MOSAIC HOUSING CORP I
    4× · 2021–2025 · $56k · revenue +14% · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • MH
    MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIV - ROCKFORD
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue -45% · 27% of their budget
  • OO
    OAKS OF DUNN COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $34k · revenue +258%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Piazza Apartments

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped. regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
2
Mosaic Therapy Collective
Social Science
3
The Mosaic Development Inc

Organization's mission is to provide housing to needy people.

Housing & Shelter
4
Lorien Homes Inc

The entity renovates and maintains residential rental properties designed for low income adults with disabilities under section 811 of the national affordable housing act.

Housing & Shelter
5
Mosaic Development Group

To enhance communities and improve lives through diverse housing and economic development solutions. mosaic believes that high quality housing for a variety of incomes is a catalyst for vibrant, healthy communities. their vision is that…

—
6
Mosaic

Embracing god's call, mosaic relentlessly pursues opportunities that empower people.

Housing & Shelter
7
Rouse-Brokenstraw Associates Corporation

Housing for low-income elderly tenants.

—
8
Housing Development Fund Co

Subsidized housing

—
9
The Mosaic Foundation Inc

The mosaic foundation, a supporting foundation for mosaic, provides opportunities for donors to make charitable contributions to support the mission of mosaic and its affiliates, and oversees the investment of assets accumulated through…

Human Services
10
Mount Zion Housing Authority of Hammond

To provide housing for the elderly & handicapped.

—
11
Mosaic Counseling

Mosaic counseling serves the mental health needs of a community through accessible, affordable, professional counseling, by connecting individuals to personalized support in their time of need.

—
12
Mmiii Inc

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mosaic Housing Corp Xii; the most unlike its peers is Oaks of Dunn County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOSAIC HOUSING CORP II: $151,700 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP IIMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVIII - OSCEOLA-WAUKON: $101,900 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVIII - OSCEOLA-WAUKONMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XII: $70,790 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIIMOSAIC HOUSING CORP I: $56,000 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP IMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVII - BEATRICE: $54,455 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVII - BEATRICEMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XV - COUNCIL BLUFFS: $45,808 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XV - COUNCIL BLUFFSMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIX - WINFIELD: $40,500 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIX - WINFIELDMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIV - ROCKFORD: $39,667 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIV - ROCKFORDMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIII: $34,000 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING I: $29,869 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC HOUSING CORP VIII: $23,463 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $28,500 · Housing & ShelterOAKS OF DUNN COUNTY INC: $33,996 · OtherOAKS OF DUN…MOSAIC HOUSING COPR IX: $19,900 · OtherMOSAIC HOUS…AUSTIN OPTIONS PROPERTIES III INC: $17,660 · OtherAUSTIN OPTI…AUSTIN OPTIONS PROPERTIES IV INC: $9,080 · OtherAUSTIN OPTI…MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XXII - LOGAN: $38,890 · EducationMOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING OF ROCKFORD I: $20,500 · HealthMOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING II: $7,000 · Human Services
Housing & Shelter$676,652Other$80,636Education$38,890Health$20,500Human Services$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP II: $151,700 over 7y, 45% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVIII - OSCEOLA-WAUKON: $101,900 over 6y, 71% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XII: $70,790 over 2y, 37% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP I: $56,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVII - BEATRICE: $54,455 over 3y, 55% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XV - COUNCIL BLUFFS: $45,808 over 2y, 34% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIX - WINFIELD: $40,500 over 3y, 28% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIV - ROCKFORD: $39,667 over 1y, 27% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XXII - LOGAN: $38,890 over 4y, 56% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP XIII: $34,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetOAKS OF DUNN COUNTY INC: $33,996 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetMOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING I: $29,869 over 2y, 52% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP VIII: $23,463 over 3y, 27% of budgetMOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING OF ROCKFORD I: $20,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetMOSAIC HOUSING CORP VII: $12,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetMOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING II: $7,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mosaic funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mosaic. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mosaic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home