How much did MOSAIC grant in FY2023?

MOSAIC reported 6 grants totaling $205,413 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

MOSAIC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

MOSAIC

Embracing god's call, MOSAIC relentlessly pursues opportunities that empower people.

$205k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$40k

Largest

01What you fund

0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Housing & Shelter$303kEducation$17kHealth$10kOther$34k

03FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k3 grants · $26k
$10k–50k3 grants · $66k

$11,065

Median grant

States reached

$207M

Total assets

Largest grants

MOSAIC HOUSING CORP I$40,000
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVIII - OSCEOLA-WAUKON$14,500
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XVII - BEATRICE$11,065
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP VIII$9,500
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP II$9,000
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XXII - LOGAN$7,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$183k · 5 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$183k

$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%

+9%

Still filing today

100%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MH
MOSAIC HOUSING CORPORATION II
5× · 2018–2023 · $55k · revenue +88%
MH
MOSAIC HOUSING CORPORATION XIII
3× · 2019–2022 · $26k · revenue +29%
MH
MOSAIC HOUSING CORP XXII - LOGAN
2× · 2022–2023 · $17k · revenue +71%

Funded once

MH
MOSAIC HOUSING CORPORATION XIV
one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue -42% · 27% of their budget
MH
MOSAIC HOUSING CORPORATION XII
one grant, 2021 · $39k · revenue +9% · 37% of their budget
OO
OAKS OF DUNN COUNTY INC
one grant, 2021 · $34k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mosaic Community Development

Alleviate poverty by uniting and strengthening vulnerable neighborhoods.

Human Services

Mosaic

Embracing god's call, mosaic relentlessly pursues opportunities that empower people.

Housing & Shelter

The Mosaic Development Inc

Organization's mission is to provide housing to needy people.

Housing & Shelter

Mosaic Development Group

To enhance communities and improve lives through diverse housing and economic development solutions. mosaic believes that high quality housing for a variety of incomes is a catalyst for vibrant, healthy communities. their vision is that…

—

Mosaic Therapy Collective

Social Science

Housing Development Fund Co

Subsidized housing

—

Crystal Run Borrower Corporation Iii

The agency was formed in 1997 to own and operate an 8-bed residential facility for developmentally disabled persons.

Unclassified

Crystal Run Owner Corporation Vi

The agency was formed to own and operate a 6-bed residential facility for developmentally disabled persons.

Human Services

Lorien Homes Inc

The entity renovates and maintains residential rental properties designed for low income adults with disabilities under section 811 of the national affordable housing act.

Housing & Shelter

Community Housing of La Crosse Inc

Low income housing

—

Crystal Run Owners Corporation Iv

The agency was formed to own and operate a 6-bed residential facility for developmentally disabled persons.

Human Services

Crystal Run Borrower Corporation Ii

The agency was formed to own and operate a 12-bed residential facility for developmentally disabled persons

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mosaic Housing Corp Xviii and the most unlike its peers is Mosaic Illinois Housing of Rockford I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

6/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$302,908Other$33,996Education$17,000Health$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MOSAIC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING I.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 202997161 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MOSAIC ILLINOIS HOUSING I, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 52% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mosaic?

Find your warmest path to Mosaic through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MOSAIC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mosaic?

More from the funding graph

MOSAIC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mosaic?

More from the funding graph