Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Morris Communications Foundation Trust Agreement

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$195kArts & Culture$32k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$32,064
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Morris Museum of Art$32,064
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 61% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA KEARNEY: $5k → 13%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%CHADRON STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 16%SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGY: $5k → 11%LETOURNEAU UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $5k → 15%DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5k → 14%DODGE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $10k → 15%KANSAS STATE UNIVERISTY: $5k → 20%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA: $10k → 6%Morris Museum of Art: $32k → 18%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 24%BLESSING RIEMAN COLLEGE OF NURSING: $5k → 13%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%WAYNE STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 13%CHADRON STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $5k → 15%DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERISTY: $5k → 20%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 15%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 24%BLESSING RIEMAN COLLEGE OF NURSING: $5k → 13%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%CHADRON STATE COLLEGE: $3k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%CHADRON STATE COLLEGE: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NE
MO
MD
KS
AR
TN
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$120k · 11 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$120k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+70%

Still filing today

9%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k
  • CS
    CHADRON STATE COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $15k
  • BR
    BLESSING RIEMAN COLLEGE OF NURSING
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +40%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

Lehigh university strives to earn international prominence as a universty of special distinction and provide students with opportunities for success through its integration of teaching, research and service to society.

Education
2
Mcdaniel College Inc

Students are the focus at mcdaniel and providing the ideal learning environment is our goal.

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Delaware State University

Delaware state university is a public institution that offers opportunity to diverse populations.

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

A private four-year university providing higher education to individuals seeking advancement.

6
Florida Southern College

Private united methodist affiliated college that is committed to educational excellence.

Education
7
Drury University

Drury University is an independent university, church-related, grounded in the liberal arts tradition and committed to personalized education in a community of scholars who value the arts of teaching and learning.

Education
8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
Dickinson College

See schedule o.dickinson college, founded in 1783, is a highly selective, private residential liberal arts college known for its innovative curriculum. for more than two centuries, dickinson has embraced the vision of an ever-evolving…

Education
10
Muhlenberg College

Muhlenberg aims to help students become independent critical thinkers who are intellectually agile, characterized by a zest for reasoned and civil debate, knowledgeable about the achievements and traditions of diverse civilizations and…

Education
11
Dordt University

Dordt university was founded in 1955 and provides christ-centered education for students, alumni, and the broader community.

Education
12
The Associates of the University

The Organization's mission is to accept donations from sources within the United States for the benefit of the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is LeTourneau University and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORRIS MUSEUM OF ART — $32,064 · OtherMORRIS MUSEUM OF ARTUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE — $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEECHADRON STATE COLLEGE — $15,000 · OtherCHADRON STATE COLLEGEBLESSING RIEMAN COLLEGE OF NURSING — $10,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $10,000 · OtherGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherSAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS — $10,000 · Other+8 more — $40,000 · Other+8 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLE…DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationDAVENPORT UNIVE…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS U…LeTourneau University — $5,000 · EducationLeTourneau Univ…
Other$192,064Education$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMORRIS MUSEUM OF ART — $32,064 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeTourneau University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORRIS MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LeTourneau University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Morris Communications Foundation Trust Agreement funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Johns Hopkins University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morris Communications Foundation Trust Agreement?

Find your warmest path to Morris Communications Foundation Trust Agreement through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph