Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Public charity

Morgan Lewis Foundation

The MORGAN LEWIS FOUNDATION is organized and operated for charitable and educational purposes, including making scholarships to deserving college and law school students and grants to other qualified charitable organizations.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$1.0M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$300,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$300,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 5
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$3.9M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Morgan Lewis Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 51% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EducationCivil RightsInternationalYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropy
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$1.0M100%
FY20232$12k50%
FY20225$36k100%
FY20214$1.2M100%
FY20191$25kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$679kEducation$349kCivil Rights$307kArts & Culture$300kPublic Safety & Disaster$300kCrime & Legal$287kYouth Development$9kHealth$6kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Morgan Lewis Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAACP Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc: $307,429 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Magen David Adom: $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of United Hatzalah Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Negro College Fund Inc: $296,018 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEqual Justice Initiative: $286,703 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHuman Rights Watch Inc: $279,415 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSeeds of Peace Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPresident-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThurgood Marshall Academy: $11,594 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAchieve Now: $10,612 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHeart of Los Angeles Youth Inc: $8,668 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBailey House Inc: $6,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunities in Schools of Houston Inc: $5,583 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRead Ahead Inc: $5,273 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Morgan Lewis Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morgan Lewis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Morgan Lewis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Morgan Lewis Foundation

How much does Morgan Lewis Foundation give?
Morgan Lewis Foundation reported 4 itemized grants totaling $1,000,000, out of $1,500,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 5 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Morgan Lewis Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are International (30%), Education (16%), Civil Rights (14%).
Who are Morgan Lewis Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: NAACP Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc ($307k), American Friends of Magen David Adom ($300k), Friends of United Hatzalah Inc ($300k).
Does Morgan Lewis Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Morgan Lewis Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Morgan Lewis Foundation based?
Morgan Lewis Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $475k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morgan Lewis’ filings →

More from the funding graph