Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

New Hampshire · Public charity

Moosilauke Visions Inc

The purpose of this charitable and educational Corporation shall be to develop, operate, manage, and support therapeutic programs and wellness initiatives that support individuals, groups, and families struggling with the impacts of mental health, developmental, and substance use related conditions, and to also promote outdoor activities…

$143k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2021
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$105k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$56M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$984kCommunity Improvement$50kEmployment$30k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mount Prospect Academy$958,93712%
Hanover Improvement Society Corporation$50,00012%
E-Motion Inc$30,00015%
The Oliverian School Inc$25,00011%

Compare Moosilauke Visions Inc with peer funders

About Moosilauke Visions Inc

How much does Moosilauke Visions Inc give?
Moosilauke Visions Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $105,000, out of $143,170 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Moosilauke Visions Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (92%), Community Improvement (5%), Employment (3%).
Who are Moosilauke Visions Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Mount Prospect Academy ($959k), Hanover Improvement Society Corporation ($50k), E-Motion Inc ($30k).
Where is Moosilauke Visions Inc based?
Moosilauke Visions Inc is based in NH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moosilauke Visions’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home