How much did MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH & grant in FY2023?

MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH & reported 1 grants totaling $501,807 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH & based?

MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH & is based in MT.

MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH &

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH &

To pursue funding opportunities to provide financial, technical, and innovative program support to mha members and the communities they serve.

$502k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$18k

Largest

01What you fund

0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Health$1.1MOther$463k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

testingplansstrengthenpreparedness aspraspr fundedfunded assessingassessing preparedness

2019

medicalpersonalizeddedicated patientspreparedness sstopsstop bleedbleed kitsvalley

2020

preparedness pandemicrural opiodopiod responseresponse implementationimplementation subawardeesubawardee fulfillfulfill objectives

2021

coordinatingcovid equipmentequipment purchasestraining educationimplementationconductingassessment

2022

coordinatingrural opiodopiod responseresponse implementationimplementation subawardeesubawardee fulfillfulfill objectives

2023

care

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$18,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

STILLWATER BILLINGS CLINIC$18,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 50% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.1M · 25 repeat orgs$504k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 24 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.1M

$504k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+63%

Still filing today

84%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MQ
MOUNTAIN-PACIFIC QUALITY HEALTH
3× · 2020–2022 · $204k · revenue +7%
SJ
ST JAMES HEALTHCAREINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE
5× · 2018–2022 · $135k · revenue +26%
PM
PONDERA MEDICAL CENTER
3× · 2018–2020 · $79k · revenue +33%

Funded once

MM
MPCA - MONTANA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $87k · revenue +118%
KR
KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCAREgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $69k · revenue +596%
PM
PROVIDENCE MONTANA HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $45k · revenue +151%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Pinnacle Health Medical Services

Pinnacle health medical services provides primary care, clinic and specialty physician services.

Health

Renown Health

To establish, equip and maintain one or more general acute care hospitals and medical centers.

Health

MaineHealth

MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…

Health

Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health

Intermountain Healthcare

Provide strategic and fiduciary leadership for philanthropic endeavors of ihc health services, inc.

Health

Renown South Meadows Medical Center

A 115-bed acute-care hospital and a 62 bed rehabilitation hospital.

Health

Montana Healthcare Foundation

Philanthropy

Memorial Health System

To improve lives and build stronger communities through better health.

Health

Stanford Health Care

Health

Medical Center of the Rockies

We improve lives through learning, healing, discovery, and through human connection.

Health

Mountain States Health Alliance

Honor those we serve by delivering the best possible care.

Health

Falls Community Hospital & Clinic Inc

Providing quality care in inpatient and outpatient services, emergency services, rural health clinic and ancillary services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Billings Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Logan Health - Whitefish. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/67

the rest of the field

715/9,905

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

54/54

Grantees still filing

54/54

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$1,114,320Other$462,723

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Heart Association IncTX58.2× affinity31 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · Rural Health Development Inc · Montana Healthcare Foundation · The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley · Montana Community Foundation Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH & funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BENEFIS TETON MEDICAL CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 810388136 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BENEFIS TETON MEDICAL CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Montana Health Research &?

Find your warmest path to Montana Health Research & through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH &

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Montana Health Research &?

More from the funding graph

MONTANA HEALTH RESEARCH &

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Montana Health Research &?

More from the funding graph