Skip to content

· Private foundation

Monica Heaney Nackard Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$204kEducation$163kHuman Services$80kScience & Tech$79kHealth$47kPhilanthropy$43kRecreation & Sports$25kYouth Development$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$811k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
HOLY TRINITY NEWMAN CENTER$10,000
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PHOENIX$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO DE ASIS$10,000
HOPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
CROSIER FATHERS$5,000
EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULC$2,500
PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SISTERS CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH$1,000
FRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER$1,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS$500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA$500
FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER$500
NORTHLAND HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAINBOW ACRES: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $100 → 13%RAINBOW ACRES: $250 → 14%FLAGSTAFF YOUTH RIDERS: $10k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%RAINBOW ACRES: $250 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%RAINBOW ACRES: $250 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%RAINBOW ACRES: $50 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%RAINBOW ACRES: $50 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%VALLEY OF THE SUN YMCA: $3k → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE: $500 → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVIC: $1k → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE: $500 → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE: $500 → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE: $500 → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE: $100 → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
SD
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$441k · 39 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
34

Total granted

$441k
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+32%

Still filing today

31%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionArts & CultureScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Phoenix Children's Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +98%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +53%
  • FF
    FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BC
    BROPHY COLLEGE PREPARATORY
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • FV
    FLAG VELO INC DBA FLAGSTAFF BIKING
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flagstaff Medical Center

Improving health, healing people.

Health
2
The Dons of Arizona
Education
3
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
5
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

—
6
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
7
Canyonlands Community Health Center

The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.

—
8
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
11
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
12
Banner Health

Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Arizona Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Judes Ranch for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIOCESE OF PHOENIX: $127,500 · OtherDIOCESE OF PHOENIXBROPHY COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $55,000 · OtherBROPHY COLLEGE PREPARATORYSAN FRANCISCO DE ASIS: $31,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO DE ASISST SIMON AND JUDE CATHEDRAL SCHOOL: $31,000 · OtherST SIMON AND JUDE CATHEDRAL SCHOOLHOPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $30,200 · OtherHOPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERSACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherFLAG VELO INC DBA FLAGSTAFF BIKING: $22,500 · OtherHOLY TRINITY NEWMAN CENTER: $20,500 · Other+51 more: $171,555 · Other+51 moreLOWELL OBSERVATORY: $78,800 · Science & TechLOWELL OBSERV…ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $7,500 · PhilanthropyCatholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix: $17,500 · ReligionSunshine Rescue Mission: $750 · Religion+2 more: $800 · ReligionFlagstaff Youth Riders Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $2,500 · Human ServicesNORTHLAND HOSPICE: $2,200 · Human ServicesRAINBOW ACRES: $1,350 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,200 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesPhoenix Children's Hospital: $9,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $2,500 · HealthTHE BOARD OF VISITORS: $1,500 · HealthHIGH COUNTRY ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $1,680 · Recreation & Sports
Other$514,255Science & Tech$78,800Philanthropy$22,500Religion$19,050Human Services$18,350Health$13,000Recreation & Sports$1,680

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOWELL OBSERVATORY: $78,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCatholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlagstaff Youth Riders Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER: $2,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND HOSPICE: $2,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $1,680 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOARD OF VISITORS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW ACRES: $1,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Northern Arizona Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSunshine Rescue Mission: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DRY CREEK ARTS FELLOWSHIP: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOWELL OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Flagstaff Youth Riders Inc ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND HOSPICE ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF VISITORS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ32.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Geile Charitable Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Molly and Joseph Herman Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Anastasia & KR Jenkins Foundation · The M J Saad Family Foundation · Bbr Foundation · Alexander and Linda Milley Foundation · The Narbha Institute Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monica Heaney Nackard Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monica Heaney Nackard Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Monica Heaney Nackard Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Monica Heaney Nackard Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monica Heaney Nackard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph