Skip to content

· Private foundation

Monderer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$541k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$340k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$925kEducation$604kHousing & Shelter$100kPhilanthropy$25kAnimals$25kYouth Development$22kCommunity Improvement$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
  • $250k+1 grant · $340k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$340,000
CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$100,000
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$80,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
OGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION$5,000
BROADWAY BARKS$5,000
SQUASHBUSTERS$4,300
NC ADULT SOCCER ASSOCIATION$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $25k → 17%CARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 11 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$2.0M
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+17%

Still filing today

55%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    5× · 2021–2025 · $791k · revenue +17%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +205%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $185k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TU
    TUFTS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +31%
  • WS
    WEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
4
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
5
Umass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent)

Umass memorial health care, inc. is committed to improving the health of the people of central new england through excellence in clinical care, services, teaching, and research.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
11
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
12
The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Provide fundraising, support, and maintains pooled investments for entities of the mount sinai health system, inc.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care for the Homeless; the most unlike its peers is Broadway Barks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATIONGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $240,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITALTUFTS UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherTUFTS UNIVERSITYCOLUMBIA GRAMMAR & PREP SCHOOL: $50,000 · Other+9 more: $70,400 · Other+9 moreTrustees of Tufts College: $791,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $185,000 · HealthTHE CENTER F…THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $50,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SI…Dempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care: $25,000 · HealthDempsey Cent…CARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $75,000 · Human ServicesBROADWAY BARKS INC: $30,000 · AnimalsSQUASHBUSTERS INC: $26,300 · Youth DevelopmentWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $25,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,060,400Education$791,000Health$260,000Human Services$75,000Animals$30,000Youth Development$26,300Housing & Shelter$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $791,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $185,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY BARKS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetSQUASHBUSTERS INC: $26,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY BARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds Dempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monderer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monderer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Monderer’s filings →

More from the funding graph