Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Monderer Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$359k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$925kEducation$604kHousing & Shelter$100kPhilanthropy$25kAnimals$25kYouth Development$22kCommunity Improvement$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$120,000
CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$100,000
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$80,000
DEMPSEY CENTER$25,000
BROADWAY BARKS$20,000
SQUASHBUSTERS$12,000
NC ADULT SOCCER ASSOCIATION$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $25k → 17%CARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 11 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$1.5M
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+17%

Still filing today

55%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    4× · 2021–2024 · $451k · revenue +17%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +205%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $185k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TU
    TUFTS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +31%
  • WS
    WEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Provide fundraising, support, and maintains pooled investments for entities of the mount sinai health system, inc.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
7
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Broadway Barks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $300,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATIONMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $160,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITALTUFTS UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherTUFTS UNIVERSITYCOLUMBIA GRAMMAR & PREP SCHOOL — $50,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA GRAMMAR & PREP SCHOOL+6 more — $53,600 · Other+6 moreTrustees of Tufts College — $451,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $185,000 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR DI…THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $50,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI H…Dempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care — $25,000 · HealthDempsey Center fo…CARE FOR THE HOMELESS — $75,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBROADWAY BARKS INC — $25,000 · AnimalsSQUASHBUSTERS INC — $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$863,600Education$451,000Health$260,000Human Services$75,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Animals$25,000Youth Development$22,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $451,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $185,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARE FOR THE HOMELESS — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBROADWAY BARKS INC — $25,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetSQUASHBUSTERS INC — $22,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC
  • Who funds CARE FOR THE HOMELESS
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
  • Who funds WEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC
  • Who funds Dempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care
  • Who funds BROADWAY BARKS INC
  • Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Monderer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph