· Private foundation
Molalla Communications Educational Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k138 grants · $388k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $138k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $138,000 |
| Molalla River School District | $37,376 |
| Providence Willamette Falls Medical Foundation | $25,000 |
| Molalla Boosters Club | $6,800 |
| Molalla Chamber of Commerce | $6,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Molalla Adult Community Center | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
196 repeat relationships: 80 still active in FY2025, 116 since wound down; 61 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- FFFoundation For Rural Service3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +47%
- TATHE ANGELS IN THE OUTFIELD4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +56%
- MYMOLALLA YOUTH SPORTS INC3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- CPCity Parks Projectone grant, 2022 · $100k
- MAMolalla Area Seniors Incorporatedone grant, 2024 · $25k
- MAMOLALLA AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2024 · $11k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operation of primary/elementary school
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
To assist in the development implementation and maintenance of coordinated resource management that will enhance the natural resources business and social relationships of the McKenzie Sub-basin.
The Association is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes in conjunction with the Tillamook County Fair Board, manager and staff. The Association will work to further and promote the…
Issue scholarships for secondary ag eduction
The provide schools with competent basketball officials who are approved by oregon schools activities association.
Public education related to clean water resources.
Organize and coordinate wrestling competitions for children aged 6-18 and and senior divisions (adults) in the state of oregon
Mcculloch county junior livestock show benefiting the 4-h and ffa youth of mcculloch county.
How this is measured
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 424 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Molalla Communications Educational Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Molalla Communications Educational Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Todos Juntos Inc: 64% of income from government
- Antfarm Inc: 29% of income from government
- Molalla River Watch Inc: 21% of income from government
- Molalla River Academy: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Molalla Communications Educational Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Molalla Communications Educational Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Molalla Communications Educational’s filings →