· Private foundation
Moise y Safra Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $389k
- $50k–250k32 grants · $3.1M
- $250k+14 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK | $2,109,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $2,050,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JEWISH HOSPITALS AND EDUCATION CENTERS OF BRAZIL | $2,000,000 |
| AMIT CHILDREN INC | $1,000,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER | $1,000,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC BEIT HALOCHEM | $600,000 |
| AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK | $600,000 |
| BELEV ECHAD INC | $586,000 |
| THE SAM ADVISORY COUNCIL INC | $500,000 |
| WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS AMERICAN SECTION | $400,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OR NATIONAL MISSIONS | $300,000 |
| MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH | $286,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES | $250,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY INC | $250,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC | $230,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $37.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
92 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JEWISH HOSPITALS AND EDUCATION CENTERS OF BRAZIL INC3× · 2022–2024 · $12M · revenue +725% · 96% of their budget
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +39%
- JAJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL7× · 2017–2024 · $4.8M · revenue +147%
Funded once
- JAJewish Agcy for Israel N Ameri Councilone grant, 2018 · $1.0M
- FOFRIENDS OF CHABAD MORUMBI BRAZILone grant, 2023 · $500k
- AFAmerican Friends of Binyan AVone grant, 2018 · $315k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
Support of religious schools in Israel
To further jewish education in israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Agency for Israel - North American Council and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Binyan-Av Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 185 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JEWISH HOSPITALS AND EDUCATION CENTERS OF BRAZIL INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds MENORA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds American Friends Of Or National Missions ↗
- Who funds MOSDOT BETH YAAKOV ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
- Who funds OR HACHAYIM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds OHR YOSEF INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEN YAD-BRAZIL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BINYAN-AV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · E R G Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Moise y Safra Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Special Children Center — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Moise y Safra Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Moise y Safra Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.