Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mohansic Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$26kArts & Culture$12kEducation$9kCivil Rights$7kHuman Services$6kAnimals$5kInternational$5kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$12k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 93% of reported assets are held in Boeing.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CREATIVE VISIONS ATTN GRACE BREUER$7,000
GARRISON ART CENTER$3,500
PUTNAM HUMAN SOCIETY$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION DONATION: $750 → 8%EARTH WATCH INSTITUTE: $750 → 16%CREATIVE VISIONS ATTN GRACE BREUER: $7k → 12%CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%MWPTA: $500 → 14%TIRSCH (DR KELLY): $500 → 6%GARRISON ART CENTER: $4k → 6%DUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUDATION: $500 → 9%PUTNAM HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 9%EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER: $750 → 14%TISCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%STEVEN LAMM MD RESEARCH: $900 → 13%NO KID HUNGRY CAMPAIGN: $500 → 14%NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND CAMPAIGN: $2k → 16%CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%PUTNAM HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 9%EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER: $750 → 14%TISCH HOSPITAL: $900 → 17%NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND CAMPAIGN: $2k → 16%EARTHWATCH INSTITUTE: $750 → 16%PUTNAM HUMAN SOCIETY: $4k → 6%EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER: $750 → 14%NYU HEMATOLOGY: $750 → 17%EARTHWATCH INSTITUTE: $750 → 16%EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER: $750 → 14%NYU HEMATOLOGY: $750 → 17%PUTNAM HUMANE CENTER: $1k → 6%EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER: $750 → 14%EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER: $750 → 14%PUTNAM HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 6%UNICEF: $4k → 17%PUTNAM HUMANE CENTER: $750 → 6%TIRSCH: $1k → 17%TIRSCH (DR LAMM): $750 → 17%PUTNAM HUMANE CENTER: $700 → 6%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $5k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $3k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $2k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN (PORTLOCK): $2k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN (GERIATRIC): $2k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS DONATION: $750 → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDOF AMERICA DONATION: $1k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $750 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
SC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 12 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
21

Total granted

$50k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+69%

Still filing today

42%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Civil RightsArts & CultureInternationalScience & TechCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • GA
    GARRISON ART CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +78%
  • EC
    EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +76%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
2
Global Campaign for Education-Us

To promote education as a basic human right and mobilize to create political will in the united states and internationally to ensure universal education, which is at the core of all human development.

Education
3
Center for Democracy and Technology

Advocating for public policies that advance democratic values in the digital age.

Civil Rights
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
6
Unicef Usa Impact Fund for Children Inc

The unicef usa impact fund for children exists to develop and implement financial solutions to ensure every child is healthy, educated, protected, and respected. we believe truly scalable, long-term impact will only be accomplished when we…

Philanthropy
7
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Global Ties Us

Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.

International
10
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
11
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
12
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Fund for Unicef; the most unlike its peers is California Fire Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10,200 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCREATIVE VISIONS ATTN GRACE BREUER: $7,000 · OtherCREATIVE VISIONS ATTN GRACE BREUEREARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER INC: $4,500 · OtherEARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER INCPUTNAM HUMAN SOCIETY: $3,500 · OtherNO CHILD LEFT BEHIND CAMPAIGN: $3,250 · OtherTISCH HOSPITAL: $3,150 · OtherPUTNAM HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3,000 · OtherPUTNAM HUMANE CENTER: $2,450 · Other+19 more: $19,500 · Other+19 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 · Civil RightsGARRISON ART CENTER INC: $4,700 · Arts & CultureUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,000 · InternationalEARTHWATCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,250 · Science & TechMEDIA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $500 · Crime & LegalDUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Education
Other$66,550Civil Rights$5,000Arts & Culture$4,700International$4,000Science & Tech$3,250Crime & Legal$500Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGARRISON ART CENTER INC: $4,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER INC: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHWATCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds GARRISON ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds EARTHWATCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds DUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mohansic Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mohansic Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mohansic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph