Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moerlein Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$1k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Moerlein Family Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2025, the last year Moerlein Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $7k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’21
10
’22
8
’23
11
’24
14
’25
1
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Environment$4kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$3kSocial Science$3kHealth$3kInternational$2kReligion$1kHuman Services$814Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
11
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI FREESTORE FOODBANK$1,350
WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL$650
BISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE$650
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$600
RAINFOREST$600
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$500
Individual grant recipient$350
CINCINNATI OFF ROAD ASSISTANCE$250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$250
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$250
PURDUE$250
CU$250
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$200
DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION$200
WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $607) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW MOMS: $157 → 14%NEW MOMS: $150 → 14%NEW MOMS: $100 → 14%NEW MOMS: $100 → 14%YMCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
MD
AZ
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20k · 14 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call). Read against FY2025, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$20k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FREESTORE FOODBANK INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $750 · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • G
    GOFUNDMEORG
    one grant, 2022 · $550 · revenue -70%
  • WA
    WHHS ALUMNI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • WJ
    WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Just Capital Foundation Inc

Just capital's mission is to build a more just economy that works for all americans by helping companies improve how they serve all their stakeholders - workers, customers, communities, the environment, and shareholders - as defined by the…

Social Science
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Disabilityin

The organization is the leading nonprofit resource for business disability inclusion worldwide. together with the world's leading brands, disability:in drives progress on disability inclusion through initiatives, tools, and expertise that…

Community Improvement
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
11
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Little Allies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $93,040 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more: $550 · PhilanthropyBISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE: $2,900 · OtherBISHOP NOLL IN…WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL: $2,400 · OtherWALNUT HILLS H…RAINFOREST: $1,800 · OtherRAINFORESTIndividual grant recipient: $1,100 · OtherIndividual gra…TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PU…CU: $1,000 · OtherCUMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $750 · OtherDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $750 · Other+20 more: $3,485 · Other+20 moreFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $2,400 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $250 · Food & NutritionWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,800 · InternationalAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $908 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 · HealthNEW MOMS INC: $507 · Human ServicesYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $100 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $100 · Human Services
Philanthropy$93,590Other$15,185Food & Nutrition$2,650Environment$2,500International$1,800Health$1,008Human Services$707

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $908 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $507 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JUSTICE PROJECT: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUE STAR FOUNDATION INC: $161 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB: $107 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE ALLIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUE STAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB ↗
  • Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE ALLIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moerlein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moerlein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moerlein Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph