Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Moerlein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Environment$4kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$3kSocial Science$3kHealth$3kInternational$2kReligion$1kHuman Services$814Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
11
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI FREESTORE FOODBANK$1,350
BISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE$650
WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL$650
RAINFOREST$600
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$600
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$500
ST JUDE$350
CINCINNATI OFF ROAD ASSISTANCE$250
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$250
PURDUE$250
CU$250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$250
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$200
DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION$200
WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $607) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW MOMS: $157 → 14%NEW MOMS: $150 → 14%NEW MOMS: $100 → 14%NEW MOMS: $100 → 14%YMCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
MD
AZ
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20k · 14 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$20k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FREESTORE FOODBANK INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $750 · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • G
    GOFUNDMEORG
    one grant, 2022 · $550 · revenue -70%
  • WA
    WHHS ALUMNI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Just Capital Foundation Inc

Just capital's mission is to build a more just economy that works for all americans by helping companies improve how they serve all their stakeholders - workers, customers, communities, the environment, and shareholders - as defined by the…

Social Science
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
8
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
9
Transfair Usa

Fair trade usa is building an innovative model of responsible business, conscious consumerism, and shared value to eliminate poverty and enable a sustainable development for farmers, workers, their families, and communities around the…

International
10
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
11
Witness Inc

Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. witness is working towards a world where the communities we center, serve, and support can safely and effectively use video and technology to end human…

International
12
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Little Allies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE — $2,900 · OtherBISHOP NOLL INSTITUTEWALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL — $2,400 · OtherWALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOLRAINFOREST — $1,800 · OtherRAINFORESTST JUDE — $1,100 · OtherST JUDECU — $1,000 · OtherCUTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $750 · OtherDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION — $750 · Other+19 more — $3,435 · Other+19 moreFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $2,400 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FO…Feeding America — $250 · Food & NutritionFeeding Amer…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDL…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,800 · InternationalAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $908 · HealthNEW MOMS INC — $507 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator — $100 · Human ServicesYWCA of Greater Cincinnati — $100 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG — $550 · Philanthropy
Other$15,135Food & Nutrition$2,650Environment$2,500International$1,800Health$908Human Services$707Philanthropy$550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $908 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION — $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MOMS INC — $507 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JUSTICE PROJECT — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUE STAR FOUNDATION INC — $161 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE ALLIES INC — $100 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TRUE STAR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB
  • Who funds Charity Navigator
  • Who funds LITTLE ALLIES INC
  • Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Moerlein Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph