Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mjw Financial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$70kEducation$10kHealth$7kAnimals$7kYouth Development$6kPhilanthropy$5kCommunity Improvement$1kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$76k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER$22,000
ITS THE LITTLE THINGS OF HOWARD COUNTY$5,000
INDIANA YOUTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC$2,500
GOLF 4 AUTISM$2,500
PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED$2,500
ROTARY CLUB OF GREENVIELD CO GIFT OF LIFE$1,750
TURN AWAY NO LONGER$928
HANCOCK HEALTH FOUNDATION$300
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TURN AWAY NO LONGER: $928 → 15%SERVANTS AT WORK INC: $4k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $22k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $9k → 16%INDIANA YOUTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 3 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$63k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
0%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Shepherd Community Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $61k · revenue +30%
  • HR
    HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500

Funded once

  • BL
    BRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +148%
  • LD
    LUCKY DOG RETREAT RESCUE INCORPORAT
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -41%
  • SA
    Servants at Work Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Association of Realtors Inc

To serve its members and local associations by providing leadership programs and services to sustain a healthy real estate market in indiana. in providing these services, the association will raise the standards of the real estate…

—
2
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
3
Advocates for Children Inc Casa of the Sabine Neches Region

Advocacy for abused children

Civil Rights
4
Volunteers of America of Illinois

Volunteers of america of illinois partners with the people we serve to create transformational and lasting change in their lives through programs that support, empower, and transform.

—
5
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
6
Humane Society for Hamilton County

Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…

Animals
7
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
8
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
9
Alternatives Incorporated of Madison County

Alternatives incorporated strives to eradicate domestic and sexual violence through education, prevention, and intervention in central indiana. the organization exists to promote the right of all persons to live in a loving, caring, safe…

—
10
Indiana Statewide Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives

Indiana electric cooperatives exists to unify, lead, serve, and advocate for our member distribution and generation and transmission cooperatives

—
11
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
12
Columbus Hospice Inc

Care of the terminally ill

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Youth Services Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lucky Dog Retreat Rescue Incorporat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Shepherd Community Inc: $60,664 · Human ServicesShepherd Community IncServants at Work Inc: $3,500 · Human ServicesINDIANA YOUTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $928 · Human ServicesITS THE LITTLE THINGS OF HOWARD COUNTY: $5,000 · OtherITS THE LITTLE THINGS …RIELY CHILDRES FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherRIELY CHILDRES FOUNDAT…PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $2,500 · OtherPLAYWORKS EDUCATION EN…GOLF 4 AUTISM: $2,500 · OtherGOLF 4 AUTISMLUCKY DOG RESCUE: $2,000 · OtherLUCKY DOG RESCUEROTARY CLUB OF GREENVIELD CO GIFT OF LIFE: $1,750 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF GREENVI…LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY - MEGAN ROBERTS VOY NORTHEAST: $1,500 · OtherLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SO…REALTORS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherST MATTHEW'S CATHOLIC CHURCH - OCTOBERFEST DONATION: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $500 · OtherBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP: $10,000 · EducationBRIGHTLANE…LUCKY DOG RETREAT RESCUE INCORPORAT: $5,000 · AnimalsHANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,300 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthYouth Opportunity Foundation Inc: $1,200 · Youth Development
Human Services$67,592Other$21,750Education$10,000Animals$5,000Health$3,300Youth Development$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShepherd Community Inc: $60,664 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLUCKY DOG RETREAT RESCUE INCORPORAT: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetServants at Work Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYouth Opportunity Foundation Inc: $1,200 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetREALTORS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mjw Financial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mjw Financial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mjw Financial Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mjw Financial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mjw Financial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph