Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mitchiner-Gittinger Family Found

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$185kRecreation & Sports$80kPhilanthropy$30kCivil Rights$20kHousing & Shelter$15kHuman Services$863
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$595k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST CARROLL SUMMER YOUTH BASEBALL$20,000
BRIARFIELD ACADEMY$15,000
LIVE OAK WILDERNESS CAMP$5,998
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $863) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 23%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 23%THENSTED CENTER: $570 → 28%THENSTED CENTER: $293 → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$231k · 6 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$231k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+19%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BRIARFIELD ACADEMY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +28%
  • LO
    LIVE OAK WILDERNESS CAMP
    4× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +351%
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS WOMEN & CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CROWVILLE
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +3%
  • LT
    LEONA TATE FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +309%
  • TA
    TENSAS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Montessori School of Baton Rouge

Montessori pre-school and kindergarten

Education
2
Ms Delta Academies dba Leflore Legacy Ac

At Leflore Legacy Academy, we equip and empower middle school scholars with a personalized rigorous and relevant college preparatory curriculum enabling success in high school, college, and life.

Education
3
Finding Our Roots

The celebration of African American History in the Louisiana Parishes of Terrebonne, Lafourche and St. Mary

Arts & Culture
4
Live Oak Preschool

Live Oak is a preschool dedicated to building a superior foundation for lifelong learning in a nurturing, loving surrounding.

Education
5
Franklin Academy

To provide quality education in a christian atmosphere.

Education
6
New Orleans School of Glassworks Inc

Education in the Art of Glassblowing

Education
7
Southeastern Louisiana University Alumni Association Inc

To foster a tradition of loyalty by connecting and celebrating alumni and the Southeastern Community.

Education
8
New Orleans Childrens Chorus Co Cheryl Dupont

Children's chorus

—
9
Arts Council of Central Louisiana

Promotion of the arts within the Central Louisiana community parishes

Arts & Culture
10
New Orleans College Preparatory Academie

To provide educational services according to those established by law, the charter contract and the charter application/proposal; measure pupil progress toward stated goals; and participate in pupil assessments required by law, regulation,…

—
11
New Covenant Christian Academy Inc

Christian education of children

Education
12
Covenant Nursery School

None

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Orleans Women & Children's Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Briarfield Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIARFIELD ACADEMY INC: $157,697 · EducationBRIARFIELD ACADEMY INCLIVE OAK WILDERNESS CAMP: $52,124 · EducationLIVE OAK WILDERNESS CAMPLEONA TATE FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE INC: $20,000 · EducationLEONA TATE FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE INCTENSAS ACADEMY: $20,000 · EducationTENSAS ACADEMYFRIENDS OF CROWVILLE: $30,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF…EAST CARROLL SUMMER YOUTH BASEBALL: $20,000 · OtherEAST CARR…UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSIT…LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI: $2,000 · OtherLOUISIANA…UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE: $1,000 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $544 · OtherNEW ORLEANS WOMEN & CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY SAILING NEW ORLEANS: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsTHENSTED CENTER: $863 · Human Services
Education$249,821Philanthropy$30,000Other$27,544Housing & Shelter$15,000Recreation & Sports$7,500Human Services$863

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIARFIELD ACADEMY INC: $157,697 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetLIVE OAK WILDERNESS CAMP: $52,124 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTENSAS ACADEMY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNEW ORLEANS WOMEN & CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SAILING NEW ORLEANS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHENSTED CENTER: $863 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIARFIELD ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVE OAK WILDERNESS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CROWVILLE ↗
  • Who funds LEONA TATE FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TENSAS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS WOMEN & CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SAILING NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds THENSTED CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harper Family FoundationLA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harper Family Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mitchiner-Gittinger Family Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mitchiner-Gittinger Family Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mitchiner-Gittinger Family Found?

    Find your warmest path to Mitchiner-Gittinger Family Found through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mitchiner-Gittinger Family Found’s filings →

    More from the funding graph