Skip to content

· Public charity

Mitchell United Way

Fund raising and support for local not-for-profit organizations.

$316k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MHealth$575kYouth Development$185kFood & Nutrition$150kCrime & Legal$136kEmployment$98kRecreation & Sports$93kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $269,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $316,476 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $47,476 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $189k
$8,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$953k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$40,000
LIFE QUEST$30,000
MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE$30,000
ABBOTT HOUSE$30,000
DAKOTA COUNCILING INSTITUTE$28,000
FIRST CITCUIT CASA PROGRAM$20,000
CORNERSTONE CAREER LEARNING$11,000
WEEKEND SNACK PACK$9,000
BOY SCOUTS$9,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$8,500
LOVE FEAST$7,000
JAMES VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$7,000
MITCHELL RECRATIONAL PROGRAMS$7,000
BIG FREIND LITTLE FRIEND$6,500
INDEPENDENT LIVING CHOICES$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $893k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIFE QUEST: $41k → 11%LIFEQUEST: $42k → 14%LIFE QUEST: $40k → 14%LIFE QUEST: $40k → 14%LIFEQUEST: $39k → 14%ABBOT HOUSE: $36k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $35k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $35k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $34k → 14%LIFE QUEST: $33k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $33k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE: $30k → 14%LIFEQUEST: $30k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $30k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAVE HOUSE: $30k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $30k → 14%LIFE QUEST: $30k → 14%LIFE QUEST: $30k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $30k → 14%ABBOTT HOUSE: $30k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE: $30k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE: $28k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE: $28k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE: $27k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE: $26k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFE HOUSE: $26k → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE: $26k → 14%RED CROSS: $5k → 14%RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 15 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$2.6M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+171%

Still filing today

53%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LIFEQUEST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $325k · revenue +74%
  • AH
    ABBOTT HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $293k · revenue +133%
  • MA
    MITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $251k · revenue +563%

Funded once

  • Y
    YWCA
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • FC
    FIRST CIRCUIT CASAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +171%
  • BF
    BIG FRIEND LITTLE FRIEND OF THE MITCHELL AREAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +137%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
2
Lewis and Clark Behavioral

To provide a broad spectrum of mental health services to residents of south dakota

Health
3
St Luke's Home

St. Luke's Home and its assisted living facility, Park Avenue Villa, exist to provide a continuum of quality care to God's people, creating a compassionate, comfortable, and family oriented atmosphere, striving to enhance the dignity and…

Human Services
4
Ywca of Fort Dodge Ia

We are a state licensed substance abuse facility which functions to provide a clinically managed residence treatment center for women and women with children.

—
5
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
6
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

—
7
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
8
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
9
Canvas Health Inc

To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.

Human Services
10
A Childs Place Casa Ltd

A Childs Place CASA Ltd. recruits screens trains & supervises CASA Volunteers to advocate on behalf of abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
11
Dakota Milestones Inc

To provide services and supports to people with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
12
Frontier Health

To provide trauma-focused quality services that encourage people to achieve their full potential.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota; the most unlike its peers is First Circuit Casa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mitchell Corn Palace: $383,292 · OtherMitchell Corn PalaceTHE SALVATION ARMY: $366,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYYMCA: $193,663 · OtherYMCAFIRST CITCUIT CASA PROGRAM: $137,248 · OtherFIRST CITCUIT CASA PROGRAMBIG FRIEND LITTLE FRIEND: $71,360 · OtherBIG FRIEND LITTLE FRIENDLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $61,500 · Other+3 more: $84,877 · Other+3 moreLIFEQUEST INC: $324,500 · Human ServicesLIFEQUEST INCABBOTT HOUSE INC: $292,500 · Human ServicesABBOTT HOUSE INCMITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE INC: $251,000 · Human ServicesMITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE INC+1 more: $25,300 · Human ServicesDAKOTA COUNSELING INSTITUTE INC: $245,000 · HealthDAKOTA COUNSEL…Avera St Luke's: $97,600 · HealthAvera St Luke'…Cornerstones Career Learning Center: $97,800 · EmploymentFIRST CIRCUIT CASA: $16,490 · Crime & LegalBIG FRIEND LITTLE FRIEND OF THE MITCHELL AREA: $11,640 · Youth Development
Other$1,297,940Human Services$893,300Health$342,600Employment$97,800Crime & Legal$16,490Youth Development$11,640

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFEQUEST INC: $324,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetABBOTT HOUSE INC: $292,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetMITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE INC: $251,000 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetDAKOTA COUNSELING INSTITUTE INC: $245,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCornerstones Career Learning Center: $97,800 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetAvera St Luke's: $97,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $61,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST CIRCUIT CASA: $16,490 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetBIG FRIEND LITTLE FRIEND OF THE MITCHELL AREA: $11,640 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFEQUEST INC ↗
  • Who funds ABBOTT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DAKOTA COUNSELING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstones Career Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds Avera St Luke's ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CIRCUIT CASA ↗
  • Who funds BIG FRIEND LITTLE FRIEND OF THE MITCHELL AREA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mitchell United Way funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mitchell United Way. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mitchell United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph