Skip to content

· Public charity

Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundation

To provide civil legal services to the poor, to improve the administration of justice; and to promote other programs for the benefit of the public as are approved by the supreme court of missouri.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$925k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$3.4M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $396k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.6M
$219,960
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI$924,960
LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI$919,320
LEGAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI$755,760
MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES$219,960
SPRINGFIELD BAR FOUNDATION$58,668
ST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATION$58,668
KANSAS CITY BAR FOUNDATION$58,668
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%SPRINGFIELD BAR FOUNDATION: $73k → 15%LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI: $925k → 15%MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES: $220k → 17%ST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATION: $73k → 21%SPRINGFIELD BAR FOUNDATION: $59k → 15%LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI: $711k → 15%MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES: $178k → 17%ST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATION: $59k → 21%SPRINGFIELD BAR FOUNDATION: $45k → 15%LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI: $286k → 15%MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES: $71k → 17%ST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATION: $45k → 21%LEGAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $756k → 15%KANSAS CITY BAR FOUNDATION: $73k → 15%LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $919k → 21%LEGAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $641k → 15%KANSAS CITY BAR FOUNDATION: $59k → 15%LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $632k → 21%LEGAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $258k → 15%KANSAS CITY BAR FOUNDATION: $45k → 15%LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $254k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 90% of Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 10%.

Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$6.4M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    Legal Aid of Western Missouri
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +14%
  • LS
    LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +119%
  • LS
    Legal Services of Southern Missouri
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +100%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    South Carolina Legal Services

    South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.

    Crime & Legal
    2
    Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundation

    To provide civil legal services to the poor, to improve the administration of justice; and to promote other programs for the benefit of the public as are approved by the supreme court of missouri.

    Philanthropy
    3
    Kansas Bar Association

    The association is dedicated to advancing the professionalism and legal skills of lawyers, promoting the interests of the legal profession, providing services to its members, advocating positions on law-related issues, encouraging public…

    —
    4
    Birmingham Volunteer Lawyers Program Inc

    To provide free legal services to low-income citizens of jefferson county

    Crime & Legal
    5
    Legal Aid Society of Middle Tennessee and the Cumberlands

    To enforce, advance and defend the civil legal rights of low income and vulnerable people, especially on behalf of elderly, children, victims of domestic violence and persons with disabilities, by providing free, civil legal assistance to…

    —
    6
    Legal Aid of East Tennessee

    Legal aid of east tennessee provides legal representation, legal education, and other civil legal services for the low-income population in our community through advocacy of all types.

    —
    7
    Legal Aid Services of Oregon

    The primary purpose of legal aid services of oregon shall be to achieve justice for the low-income communities of oregon by providing a full range of the highest quality civil legal services.

    Crime & Legal
    8
    Missouri Civil Justice Reform Coalition Inc

    Promotion, support, and coordination of activities to improve the legal system in Missouri through education, research and legislative reforms.

    Civil Rights
    9
    St Louis Survivors' Legal Support Inc

    SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.

    Crime & Legal
    10
    Legal Services of Northern Michigan

    To be a public law firm that knows, as well as understands, the problems of even the poorest in our communities and addresses these problems through education, and with creative legal advocacy of the highest distinction. LSNM will be seen…

    Crime & Legal
    11
    Louisville Bar Foundation Inc

    To raise and distribute funds in the form of grants to not for profit organizations in the Louisville area that provide legal services to the poor and disadvantaged, conduct programs to educate citizens about the law, and support…

    Crime & Legal
    12
    Louisville Bar Center Inc

    To work in concert with the louisville bar association, to promote the legal profession and the study of law through continuing education for lawyers and improve the community through the provision of law-related benefits, including pro…

    Employment
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legal Services of Eastern Missouri Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jackson County Casa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    05the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Legal Aid of Western Missouri: $1,922,020 · Crime & LegalLegal Aid of Western MissouriLEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $1,805,428 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI INCST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATION: $176,693 · Crime & LegalKANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN BAR FOUNDATION: $176,693 · Crime & LegalSPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN BAR FOUNDATION: $176,693 · Crime & LegalLegal Services of Southern Missouri: $1,655,206 · OtherLegal Services of Southern MissouriMID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES: $468,846 · OtherMID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES
    Crime & Legal$4,257,527Other$2,124,052

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLegal Aid of Western Missouri: $1,922,020 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $1,805,428 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetLegal Services of Southern Missouri: $1,655,206 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetMID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES: $468,846 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATION: $176,693 over 9y, 45% of budgetKANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN BAR FOUNDATION: $176,693 over 9y, 20% of budgetSPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN BAR FOUNDATION: $176,693 over 9y, 73% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Legal Aid of Western Missouri ↗
    • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
    • Who funds Legal Services of Southern Missouri ↗
    • Who funds MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds ST LOUIS BAR FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN BAR FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN BAR FOUNDATION ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Missouri Bar FoundationMO15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Missouri Bar Foundation · Legal Services Corporation · Littler Mendelson Foundation Inc Attn Tax Manager · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24
    no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–24
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Missouri Lawyer Trust Account’s filings →

      More from the funding graph