Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation

To educate, organize, and advocate in defense of Missouris people and their environment.

$194k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Food & Nutrition$251kHuman Services$172kCivil Rights$123kCommunity Improvement$118kArts & Culture$51kEnvironment$15kHealth$14kInternational$7k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $188,728 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $193,565 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,837 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $146k
$51,220
Median grant
1
States reached
$935k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Just Moms STL$94,560
Network for Stong Communities Collaborative Resources$51,220
Gateway Sustainable Farmers Alliance$42,948
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Gateway Region (Emerson) YMCA: $7k → 21%Gateway Region (Emerson) YMCA: $7k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$414k · 4 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$414k
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEmploymentHealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    Blackpeoplewhohike LLC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $206k
  • JM
    JUST MOMS STL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $173k
  • BW
    Be Well Cafe
    2× · 2022–2023 · $21k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • AF
    AGRICULTURE FOR COMMUNITY RESTORATION ECONOMIC JUSTICE SUSTA
    one grant, 2023 · $102k · 80% of their budget
  • NR
    NEW ROOTS URBAN FARM
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • TF
    THE FIT AND FOOD CONNECTION
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Black Urban Farmers Association
Food & Nutrition
2
Black Seeds

prove asset to organic food

Food & Nutrition
3
Syracuse Grows Inc

A grassroots network that cultivates food justice through advocacy, education, and resources in support of urban food production.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Works

Food Works is a non-profit organization dedicated to creating a sustainable food economy in Southern Illinois. Through farmer training and consumer education, Food Works promotes long-term farming networks that create healthy soils,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Just Food Initiative of the Fox Valley
Food & Nutrition
6
Columbia Farmers Market Inc

The mission of Columbia Farmers Market is to provide a space for our vibrant community of growers, producers, and makers by supporting, educating, and expanding sustainable Mid-Missouri agriculture. By

Food & Nutrition
7
Healthy Harvest Community Garden
Environment
8
Broad River Community Market

To create a thriving, equitable food system by working with local farms to provide crucial access to fresh produce to food insecure people in Cleveland County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Impact Oakland Now
Community Improvement
10
Propel Kitchens

To use nutrition and food training to enable St Louis communities to combat persistent health and economic inequities.

Food & Nutrition
11
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
12
St Louis Earth Day

To inspire and mobilize a collaborative movement towards an equitable and environmentally sustainable St Louis region every day.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Area Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Red Circle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Blackpeoplewhohike LLC — $206,080 · OtherBlackpeoplewhohike LLCJUST MOMS STL — $172,651 · OtherJUST MOMS STL+3 more — $21,000 · OtherAGRICULTURE FOR COMMUNITY RESTORATION ECONOMIC JUSTICE SUSTA — $102,049 · Food & NutritionAGRICULTURE FOR COMMUNITY RESTORA…NEW ROOTS URBAN FARM — $50,086 · Food & NutritionNEW ROOTS URBAN FARMGATEWAY SUSTAINABLE FARMERS ALLIANCE — $42,948 · Food & NutritionGATEWAY SUSTAINABLE FARMERS ALLIA…OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $14,000 · Food & NutritionOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC+2 more — $14,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 moreNSC COLLABORATIVE RESOURCES — $51,220 · Arts & CultureBe Well Cafe — $21,000 · EmploymentTHE FIT AND FOOD CONNECTION — $14,000 · HealthGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $14,000 · Human ServicesA RED CIRCLE — $14,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY RESPONSE — $14,000 · Youth Development
Other$399,731Food & Nutrition$223,083Arts & Culture$51,220Employment$21,000Health$14,000Human Services$14,000Education$14,000Youth Development$14,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAGRICULTURE FOR COMMUNITY RESTORATION ECONOMIC JUSTICE SUSTA — $102,049 over 1y, 80% of budgetGATEWAY SUSTAINABLE FARMERS ALLIANCE — $42,948 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetBe Well Cafe — $21,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE FIT AND FOOD CONNECTION — $14,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA RED CIRCLE — $14,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESPONSE — $14,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCITY GREENS MARKET INC — $7,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN HARVEST STL — $7,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · J R Albert Foundation · Regional Business Council · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph