How much did MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY grant in FY2024?

MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY reported 20 grants totaling $19,455,436 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY based?

MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY is based in MO.

MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY

The mission is to enable access to quality mental health services by all mo citizens in need of such services, while maximizing their human potential and quality of life.

$19M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$6.1M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$50k–250k8 grants · $1.2M
$250k+11 grants · $18M

$488,968

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

COMPASS HEALTH NETWORK$6,138,416
BJC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE$3,487,750
GIBSON RECOVERY CENTER$2,024,597
FCC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$1,266,169
PLACES FOR PEOPLE$1,195,865
BURRELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$1,167,033
COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES$995,163
PREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE$640,336
MARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$547,571
SEMO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$488,968
OZARK CENTER$373,760
INDEPENDENCE CENTER$240,320
ARTHUR CENTER$239,160
NORTH CENTRAL MO MENTAL HEALTH$220,625
TRI-COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES$168,285

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 26% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.1M · 6 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.1M

$9.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%

+187%

Still filing today

67%

10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OC
OZARK CENTER
2× · 2023–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +29%
GR
GIBSON RECOVERY CENTER
2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +134%
PF
PLACES FOR PEOPLE
2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +60%

Funded once

CH
COMPASS HEALTH NETWORK
one grant, 2023 · $3.2M
MT
MARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
one grant, 2023 · $2.9M
AH
ALM HOPEWELL CENTER
one grant, 2023 · $1.3M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

North Central Behavioral Health

North central behavioral health systems is dedicated to serving a diverse range of individuals with behavioral health needs in order to achieve overall wellness through available resources.

—

Kvc Bevavioral Healthcare Missouri Inc

To enrich and enhance the lives of children and their families by providing medical and behavioral healthcare, social services and education.

—

Southwest Colorado Mental Health Center

Axis health system (ahs) is the designated community mental health center, and a licensed substance use provider and a hrsa community health centers (fqhc) providing integrated primary care including oral health care. ahs offers a wide…

Health

North Oklahoma County Mental Health Center

NorthCare offers a variety of services for children, adults, and families, designed to help you, your child, and your family recover from mental illness, substance use, trauma, or crisis to live a life in recovery.

Health

Community Health Center of Central Missouri

To provide medical, dental and mental health services to residents of cole, osage, moniteau and callaway counties regardless of ability to pay.

Human Services

Adult & Child Mental Health Center Inc

With hope, compassion, and creativity we deliver life-enhancing physical, social, and behavioral healthcare services.

Health

Meridian Behavioral Healthcare Inc

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to promote recovery and offer solutions to those facing mental illnesses, addiction and other social challenges.

Health

Community Mental Health Affiliates Inc

Provide mental health, community support services and substance abuse treatment to the community.

—

Coles County Mental Health

To design and deliver an array of high quality, cost effective, outpatient behavioral health services oriented toward consumer recovery and responsive to the needs of the consumers, their families and the community.

Health

Turtle Creek Valley Mental HealthMental

Providing drug and alcohol, mental health, and intellectual and developmental disabilities

Health

The Bridge Behavioral Health Inc

To offer comprehensive substance abuse detoxification, treatment services and safe passage from addiction to sober living.

—

Hiawatha Valley Mental Health

The community leader in delivering exceptional, responsive and consumer focused behavioral health services. vision: to provide exceptional mental and behavioral support and services to enhance the well-being of our communities through a…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Guidance Center for Behavioral Healthcare and the most unlike its peers is Ozark Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/18

Grantees still filing

15/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$16,488,078Health$14,263,399Human Services$1,266,169

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater St Louis IncMO15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · The Reach Healthcare Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OZARK CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 430821959 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OZARK CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Missouri Coalition for Community?

Find your warmest path to Missouri Coalition for Community through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Missouri Coalition for Community?

More from the funding graph

MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Missouri Coalition for Community?

More from the funding graph