Skip to content

· Public charity

Mississippi Engaged

Ms engaged is a 501c3 table that coordinates and resources civic engagement efforts of nonprofit and community based organizations to build transformative community power statewide.

$153k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSISSIPPI MOVE INC$15,000
MISSISSIPPI WORKERS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS$15,000
RHO XI LAMBDA ALPHAS FOUNDATION$15,000
IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE & EQUITY$15,000
CENTER FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP$15,000
LEADING LADIES OF MISSISSIPPI$15,000
MISSISSIPPI LOW-INCOME CHILD-CARE INITIATIVE$15,000
WE MUST VOTE INC$15,000
REACHING & EDUCATING FOR COMMUNITY HOPE (RECH) FOUNDATION$15,000
COUNTYWIDE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC$15,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%MISSISSIPPI MOVE INC: $15k → 11%COUNTYWIDE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $15k → 18%RHO XI LAMBDA ALPHAS FOUNDATION: $15k → 23%LEADING LADIES OF MISSISSIPPI: $15k → 23%CENTER FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $15k → 23%IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE & EQUITY: $15k → 23%WE MUST VOTE INC: $15k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mississippi Center for Re-Entry

Our mission is to provide inspiration, services, tools, programs, support groups and resources to formerly incarcerated individuals for successful reentry into society in the local communities of Desoto, Tunica, Marshall and Tate counties.

Crime & Legal
2
Revitalize Mississippi Inc
Community Improvement
3
Center for Mississippi Healthpolicy
Health
4
Cooperation Jackson of Mississippi

Our mission is to support development of Mississippi worker-owned cooperatives

Human Services
5
Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting Inc

MCIR is an independent nonprofit news organization, tasked with educating and informing the people of Mississippi with in-depth, fact-based, nonpartisan information. MCIR focuses on institutionalized injustice and generational poverty.

Arts & Culture
6
Mississippi Delta Council F0R Workers Opportunities Inc

Employment and training agency- help displaced migrant and seasonal farmworkers enter unsubsidized employment, coupled with the assistance of supportive services and farm ownership training

Employment
7
East Ms Community Dev and Empowerme

Provide services

Community Improvement
8
Mississippi United to End Homlessness

To serve vulnerable populations with housing service and facilitate data collection, reporting and analysis

Human Services
9
Mississippi Community Education Center

Train, support & review education. the purpose of the center is for the promotion, improvement and expansion of community education through training seminars, consulting services and technical assistance.

Education
10
Mississippi Immigrant Rights Allian

Mira works to support immigrants in the free and equitable use of their rights in mississippi through public education organizing and advocacy

Civil Rights
11
Mississippi County Arkansas Economic Opportunity Commission Inc

Provide support, education and training for Low-Income indivuduals to help become self-sufficient and lead lives of dignity

—
12
Alabama Institute for Social Justice

To engage Alabamians by mobilizing communities, setting and acting upon a racial equity and social justice policy agenda, and creating peace through racial reconciliation and healing.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iaje; the most unlike its peers is Countywide Family Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSISSIPPI M O V E: $15,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI M O V EWE MUST VOTE INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsWE MUST VOTE INCLEADING LADIES OF MISSISSIPPI: $15,000 · OtherLEADING LADIES OF MISS…RHO XI LAMBDA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherRHO XI LAMBDA FOUNDATI…THE REACHING EDUCATING FOR COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementTHE REACHIN…CENTER FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTER FOR …MISSISSIPPI WORKERS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalMISSISSIPPI…Mississippi Low-Income Childcare Initiative Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesMississippi…COUNTYWIDE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $15,000 · EducationCOUNTYWIDE …IAJE: $15,000 · InternationalIAJE
Civil Rights$30,000Other$30,000Community Improvement$15,000Youth Development$15,000Crime & Legal$15,000Human Services$15,000Education$15,000International$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE REACHING EDUCATING FOR COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCENTER FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMISSISSIPPI M O V E: $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetMISSISSIPPI WORKERS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMississippi Low-Income Childcare Initiative Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetIAJE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWE MUST VOTE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bvm Capacity Building Institute IncGA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mississippi Engaged funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mississippi Engaged. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mississippi Engaged?

    Find your warmest path to Mississippi Engaged through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mississippi Engaged’s filings →

    More from the funding graph