Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Minneapolis City of Lakes Rotary Foundation

To benefit charitable, benevolent, and educational causes.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Minneapolis City of Lakes Rotary Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Kiva Microfunds, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
19
3
21
3
22
2
23
1
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

International$443kEducation$51kFood & Nutrition$29kCrime & Legal$24kYouth Development$10kCivil Rights$8kEnvironment$6k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $16,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $110,483 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $94,483 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$162k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIVA MICROFUNDS$10,000
Act United$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ACT UNITED: $8k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TWIN CITIES: $10k → 11%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $5k → 14%KIVA MICROFUNDS: $10k → 10%Rotary Club of Sacramento Foundation: $10k → 12%Rotary Club of Cedar Rapids: $5k → 9%Act United: $6k → 5%DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $11k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE UPPER MIDWEST: $5k → 14%Act United: $6k → 5%Mississppi Park Connection: $6k → 14%Act United: $6k → 5%Junior Achievement North: $35k → 14%Act United: $6k → 5%Every Meal (Sheridan Story): $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

2
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

3
Rotary International

Rotary international provides service to others, promotes integrity, and advances world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

4
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

5
Global Minnesota

Global minnesotas mission is to advance international understanding and engagement. we are committed to serving minnesota from a foundation built on the values of respect, collaboration, nonpartisanship, global competency, inclusion and…

International
6
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

7
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
8
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
9
Rit Global Delivery Corporation

Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.

Education
10
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

11
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
12
Madison Rotary Foundation

The mission of the madison rotary foundation is to work with the rotary club of madison to support its charitable activities, serve as a responsible steward of its resources, and ensure compliance with all regulations.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Act United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORLD VISION INC — $414,850 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH — $40,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH+2 more — $18,136 · InternationalACT UNITED — $31,900 · Crime & LegalEVERY MEAL — $19,084 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $5,000 · Food & NutritionDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY — $10,500 · EducationROTARY CLUB OF SACRAMENTO FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION — $6,000 · EnvironmentROTARY INTERNATIONAL CEDAR RAPIDS — $5,152 · Other
International$472,986Crime & Legal$31,900Food & Nutrition$24,084Education$10,500Community Improvement$10,000Youth Development$10,000Environment$6,000Other$5,152

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC — $414,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetACT UNITED — $31,900 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetEVERY MEAL — $19,084 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SACRAMENTO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $8,136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL CEDAR RAPIDS — $5,152 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Minneapolis City of Lakes Rotary Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Minneapolis City of Lakes Rotary Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Minneapolis City of Lakes Rotary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $76k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph