Skip to content

· Private foundation

Miller Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$28kEducation$25kHealth$23kReligion$13kAnimals$9kEnvironment$6kHousing & Shelter$1kPublic Benefit$50
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$685k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISAIAH 117 HOUSE$10,000
VALLEY STRONG DISASTGER RELIEF$5,100
FIRE FOUNDATION$5,000
Raise Your Voice$3,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$3,000
SKYLAND TRAIL$3,000
GEORGIA AQUARIUM$2,500
CAPSTONE CHURCH$2,000
UA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$750
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$600
CITY RESCUE MISSION$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VALLEY STRONG DISASTGER RELIEF: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $600 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $600 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $600 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 14 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$87k
$5k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ISAIAH 117 HOUSE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +27%
  • RY
    Raise Your Voice Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +101% · 37% of their budget
  • GW
    GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • OL
    Our Lady of the Assumption School
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • SK
    SUSAN KOMEN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k
  • MW
    MARIST WOMENS BUILD HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Genesis Health Inc

To advance health and well-being of persons requiring rehabilitation through superior outcomes, service, education and research.

Health
2
Southern Comfort Animal Rescue Inc

Southern Comfort Animal Rescue, Inc. is 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that rescues and rehomes abused, unwanted and abandoned companion animals.Southern Comfort was founded in 2001 in Savannah, Georgia, to provide shelter and find…

Animals
3
Gwinnett Medical Group Inc

Gwinnett medical group, inc., (gmgi),was formed for the purpose of establishing and operating certain hospital based and clinical outreach physician services with our service community. gmgi employs specialty physicians that serve patients…

—
4
Sma Healthcare Inc

Sma healthcare improves lives through exceptional substance abuse, mental health and primary care services. sma healthcare envisions a community where all individuals living with addiction and mental health needs, find hope, healing, and…

Health
5
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
6
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
7
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
8
LiveSafe Resources Inc

LiveSafe Resources, Inc.'s mission is to provide safety and healing with dignity and respect to survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault, giving them a voice and hope for a better future. We envision a community free from domestic…

—
9
Safe Harbour Inc

Safe harbour provides a continuum of housing and supportive services for homeless and nearly homeless individuals and families in our communities.

Housing & Shelter
10
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals
11
Wellstar Sylvan Grove Hospital

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health
12
Sharehouse Inc

The Organization is a non-profit organization providing crisis intervention and the continuum of care to address the causes and effects of family violence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Raise Your Voice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIST SCHOOL INC: $16,097 · OtherMARIST SCHOOL INCRaise Your Voice Inc: $10,000 · OtherRaise Your Voice IncOUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH BROOKHAVEN INC: $8,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH BROOKHAVEN INCSILVER LAKE CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 · OtherSILVER LAKE CIVIC ASSOCIATION INCFIRE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherFIRE FOUNDATIONCHURCH AT THE OAKS: $2,001 · OtherCAPSTONE CHURCH: $2,000 · Other+13 more: $8,511 · Other+13 moreISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $20,657 · Human ServicesISAIAH 117 HOUSEVALLEY STRONG DISASTER RELIEF INC: $5,100 · Human ServicesVALLEY STRONG DISASTER RELIEF …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,900 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · HealthGEORGE WEST…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $4,500 · HealthSHRINERS HO…GEORGIA AQUARIUM INC & SUBSIDIARY: $5,500 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $2,500 · AnimalsTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $120 · Housing & Shelter
Other$57,609Human Services$27,657Health$11,000Animals$8,000Housing & Shelter$120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $20,657 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRaise Your Voice Inc: $10,000 over 8y, 37% of budgetGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSILVER LAKE CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetGEORGIA AQUARIUM INC & SUBSIDIARY: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY STRONG DISASTER RELIEF INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Raise Your Voice Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SILVER LAKE CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA AQUARIUM INC & SUBSIDIARY ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY STRONG DISASTER RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miller Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miller Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Miller Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Miller Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Miller’s filings →

More from the funding graph