Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Millbach Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2019
3
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Arts & Culture$99kHuman Services$100
02FY2019 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$290k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULPEHOCKEN SETTLEMENT HIST SOC$13,000
LANCASTER HISTORYORG$5,000
HISTORIC SCHAEFFERSTOWN INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE SPEAKER'S HOUSE: $5k → 7%MANHEIM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%BERKS HISTORY CENTER: $500 → 11%LEBANON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 11%CENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 16%LANCASTER HISTORYORG: $5k → 9%LEESPORT LOCK HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $100 → 11%HISTORIC SCHAEFFERSTOWN INC: $4k → 11%LANCASTER HISTORYORG: $1k → 9%TULPEHOCKEN SETTLEMENT HIST SOC: $37k → 11%HISTORIC SCHAEFFERSTOWN INC: $500 → 11%LITITZ HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 9%TULPEHOCKEN SETTLEMENT HIST SOC: $13k → 11%TULPEHOCKEN SETTLEMENT HIST SOC: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$67k · 3 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +216% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$67k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+216%
+43%

Still filing today

67%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TULPEHOCKEN SETTLEMENT HIST SOC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $56k
  • L
    LANCASTERHISTORYORG
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +216%
  • HS
    HISTORIC SCHAEFFERSTOWN INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CC
    CENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +197%
  • LC
    LEBANON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • MH
    MANHEIM HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Franklin County Historical Society- Kittochtinny

The objective of the franklin county historical society - kittochtinny shall be to foster increased knowledge of the history of franklin county and the cumberland valley through a museum and library, to publish papers of the corporation at…

2
Historical Society of Mount Lebanon

The historical society of mount lebanon serves and promotes the community by collecting, preserving, interpreting, and sharing its history in ways designed to inspire our present and guide our future.

Arts & Culture
3
Lehigh County Historical Society

To collect, preserve & publish the history & historical data relative to lehigh county for the education of the general public

Arts & Culture
4
Shippensburg Historical Society Inc

Founded in 1945, the shippensburg historical society is a non-profit membership organizaiton dedicated to the collecting, preserving, and sharing the rich history of shippensburg, pennsylvania and the surronding area.

5
Historical Society of Montgomery County

The historical society of montgomery county's mission is to preserve, interpret and promote the history of montgomery county, pennsylvania and to educate the public about the region's ongoing multi-faceted cultural story... creating…

Arts & Culture
6
Leechburg Area Museum & Hist Society Inc

Preserving the history and cultural artifacts from the Western Pennsylvania town of Leechburg.

7
Clinton County Historical Society Inc

The clinton county historical society, inc. was organized for the purpose of maintaining a museum for collecting, preserving and interpreting records for artifacts significant to clinton county, pennsylvania.

Arts & Culture
8
Bureau County Historical Society
9
Biglerville Hist & Preserv Society

To preserve historical records.

10
Lebanon Historical Society
11
Pottstown Historical Society

To promote interest in, and study of the historic background of the boro of Pottstown and vicinity, and to collect historic documents and records in order to preserve local history and the history of Pennsylvania.

Arts & Culture
12
Jefferson County Historical Society

To preserve, maintain and restore historical artifacts and information for future generations.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lebanon County Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is Manheim Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TULPEHOCKEN SETTLEMENT HIST SOC — $55,628 · OtherTULPEHOCKEN SETTLEMENT HIST SOCLEBANON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 · OtherLEBANON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYMANHEIM HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,500 · OtherMANHEIM HISTORICAL SOCIETYHISTORIC SCHAEFFERSTOWN INC — $4,950 · OtherHISTORIC SCHAEFFERSTOWN INC+2 more — $1,100 · OtherCENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL…LANCASTERHISTORYORG — $6,000 · Arts & CultureLANCASTERHISTORYORGHISTORIC TRAPPE — $5,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC TRAPPE+1 more — $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$77,178Arts & Culture$21,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetLEBANON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLANCASTERHISTORYORG — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMANHEIM HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHISTORIC TRAPPE — $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetHISTORIC SCHAEFFERSTOWN INC — $4,950 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetLITITZ HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF BERKS COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Millbach Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Millbach Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Millbach Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph