Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mike Mussina Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$25kAnimals$21kYouth Development$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$284k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION$5,000
YOUNGLIFE$5,000
LYCOMING COUNTY SPCA$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YWCA NORTHCENTRAL PA: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 7 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$77k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+27%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentAnimalsFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +119%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +18%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • ML
    MONTOURSVILLE LITTLE LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +38%
  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • HO
    HARVEST OF HOPE
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lower Macungie Library

Lower macungie library strives to inform, enrich, and empower our community

Education
2
Lycoming County Library System Board

The lycoming county library system is lycoming county's free information utility, lifelong learning center, and popular materials collective.

Education
3
Wayne County Public Library Inc

Public lending library

4
Taylor Community Library Association

Public lending library

5
Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

Human Services
6
Abington Community Library Association

Public lending library

7
Lynches River Electric Cooperative Inc

To provide the best possible electric service to all who desire it within the system service area at a reasonable cost consistent with the highest standards of service.

8
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
9
Washington County Free Library

The mission of the washington county free library system is to continually improve our service to the public by:* providing the public with free access to library materials in a variety of formats* promoting community enrichment, economic…

Education
10
Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty

Animals
11
Wicomico County Free Library

It is the mission of the wicomico county free library to serve the people of wicomico county by supporting education, enriching lives, and building community.

Education
12
Reuben Mcmillan Free Library Association

The public library of youngstown and mahoning county connects people and communities to reliable resources that inspire learning and foster enrichment. this mission is accomplished through providing print resources, media resources,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Appalachia Horse Help & Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS — $7,000 · OtherAMERICAN RESCUE WORKERSMONTOURSVILLE LITTLE LEAGUE — $4,500 · OtherMONTOURSVILLE LITTLE LEAGUEAppalachia Horse Help & Rescue Inc — $4,000 · OtherAppalachia Horse Help & Rescue IncVARIOUS — $3,600 · OtherVARIOUSHARVEST OF HOPE — $3,000 · OtherHARVEST OF HOPE+2 more — $3,000 · Other+2 moreLYCOMING COUNTY SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $17,000 · AnimalsLYCOMING COUNTY SOCI…YOUNG LIFE — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFECENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL PENN…WILLING HAND HOSE CONO1 INC — $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$45,100Animals$17,000Youth Development$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$4,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLYCOMING COUNTY SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $17,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTOURSVILLE LITTLE LEAGUE — $4,500 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetWILLING HAND HOSE CONO1 INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAppalachia Horse Help & Rescue Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAMES V BROWN LIBRARY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Community Foundation Partnership of PennsylvaniaPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mike Mussina Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph