Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mike Morse Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MPhilanthropy$320kAnimals$297kReligion$94kHealth$29kHuman Services$25kCivil Rights$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$986k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY$200,000
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS$32,095
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 8%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY: $10k → 21%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 8%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 21%JARC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$1.4M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+35%

Still filing today

63%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $297k · revenue +49%
  • OC
    ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $15k · revenue +43%
  • CITY YEAR INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -37%
  • J
    JARC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -11%
  • DB
    DETROIT BRANCH NAACP
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Family & Career Services Inc

To transform lives.

Human Services
3
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
5
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
6
Jewish Big Brother & Big Sister Association of Greater Boston

Jbbbs builds and sustains life-changing friendships and mentoring relationships that inspire personal growth, promote emotional well-being, and create a more connected and engaged community guided by jewish values.

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
8
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
9
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
11
Chelsea Jewish Charitable Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in fundraising activities and provide support services to sponsor related non-profit entities which are engaged to enrich the life of each of their residents and program participants, so that each…

Health
12
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $988,181 · OtherDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLSBOOKSTOCK - JEWISH COMMUNITY: $93,500 · OtherBOOKSTOCK - JEWISH COMMUNITY+10 more: $42,290 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $320,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $296,903 · AnimalsMICHIGAN HUMANE SO…ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesJARC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSHELBY JANE SEYBURN FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE SOUTHFIELD POLICE: $1,500 · Public Benefit
Other$1,123,971Philanthropy$320,000Animals$296,903Human Services$30,000Health$3,600Public Benefit$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $320,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $296,903 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJARC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SOUTHFIELD POLICE: $1,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetYAD EZRA: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELBY JANE SEYBURN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SOUTHFIELD POLICE ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds CAMP QUALITY USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mike Morse Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mike Morse Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mike Morse Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mike Morse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mike Morse’s filings →

More from the funding graph