Skip to content

· Private foundation

Middlesex County Camp Foundation Inc

OUR MISSION IS TO ENCOURAGE GROUP LIVING IN A NATURAL SETTING WHICH FOCUSES ON THE INDIVIDUAL'S SOCIAL, SPIRITUAL, MENTAL AND PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TO ASSIST OTHER ORGANIZATIONS WHOSE ACTIVITIES CARRY OUT SUCH PURPOSE.

$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$61kYouth Development$5kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDDLESEX COUNTY 4-H ADVISORY$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HAMDENNORTH HAVEN YMCA CAMP$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MERIDEN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$5,000
CAMP SLOANE YMCA$5,000
WINDHAM TOLAND 4-H CAMP$5,000
CAMP HAZEN YMCA$5,000
CHESTER PARKS & RECREATION DEPT$5,000
NEW LONDON 4-H CAMP$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINDHAM TOLAND 4-H CAMP: $11,000 · OtherWINDHAM TOLAND 4-H CAMPMIDDLESEX COUNTY 4-H CAMP: $6,000 · OtherMIDDLESEX COUNTY 4-H CAMPMIDDLESEX COUNTY 4-H ADVISORY: $5,500 · OtherMIDDLESEX COUNTY 4-H ADVISORYMERIDEN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $5,000 · OtherMERIDEN BOYS & GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHESTER PARKS & RECREATION DEPT: $5,000 · OtherCHESTER PARKS & RECREATION DEPTHAMDENNORTH HAVEN YMCA CAMP: $5,000 · OtherHAMDENNORTH HAVEN YMCA CAMPIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAUER FARM: $3,000 · OtherAUER FARMNEW LONDON COUNTY 4-H CAMP: $3,000 · OtherNEW LONDON COUNTY 4-H CAMP+1 more: $1,500 · OtherCAMP SLOANE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SLOANE YOUNG…PATHFINDERS INC: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsPATHFINDERS INCHartford County 4-H Camp Inc: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsHartford County 4…CAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$55,000Recreation & Sports$11,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP SLOANE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHFINDERS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHartford County 4-H Camp Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP SLOANE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hartford County 4-H Camp Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Middlesex County Camp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Middlesex County Camp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Middlesex County Camp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph