Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Mickelson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$46k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Mickelson Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 71% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$2k0%
FY20244$4k50%
FY20233$3k33%
FY20223$4k67%
FY20211$1k100%
FY20202$3k0%
FY20195$8k20%
FY20186$8k100%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$10kCommunity Improvement$8kHealth$7kHuman Services$3kInternational$2kCivil Rights$1kRecreation & Sports$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Mickelson Family Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Back of the Yards Neighborhood Council$7,50070%
Francis W Parker School$6,00030%
Collaboration for Early Childhood$3,00030%
Center on Halsted$2,63630%
Himalayan Cataract Project Inc$2,00010%
Family Equality$1,20010%
Howard Brown Health Center$1,00010%
Temple Sholom of Chicago$1,0001n/a
Wikimedia Foundation Inc$1,00010%
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$1,00020%
Shedd Aquarium Society$50010%
51st Street Business Association$50010%

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($7k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Mickelson Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBack of the Yards Neighborhood Council: $7,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCollaboration for Early Childhood: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCenter on Halsted: $2,636 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHimalayan Cataract Project Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Equality: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShedd Aquarium Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget51st Street Business Association: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mickelson Family Foundation with peer funders

About Mickelson Family Foundation

How much does Mickelson Family Foundation give?
Mickelson Family Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $1,936 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Mickelson Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (29%), Community Improvement (23%), Health (21%).
Who are Mickelson Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Back of the Yards Neighborhood Council ($8k), Francis W Parker School ($6k), Collaboration for Early Childhood ($3k).
Does Mickelson Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mickelson Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mickelson Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Chicago Community Trust.
Where is Mickelson Family Foundation based?
Mickelson Family Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mickelson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph