Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Michigan Citizens for Better Health

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and local levels, that will bring about civic betterments and social improvements to Michigan residents;…

$789k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $765,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $789,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $400k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$456k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN EMPOWERMENT FUND$300,000
GRAND RAPIDS AREA COMM ENGAGE$100,000
MI DEMOCRATIC COMM ADM ACCT$100,000
THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN$50,000
BUILDING A BETTER ECONOMY$50,000
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR GOVERNMENT$50,000
MICHIGAN VALUES$50,000
GREAT LAKES WORKS FUND$25,000
MICHIGAN JOBS COALITION$10,000
MOVING MIDMICHIGAN FORWARD$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR A BRIGHTER TOMOR$10,000
FIGHTING FOR A BETTER MICHIGA$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $50k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Rising Action

Michigan Rising Action is focused on holding special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We're fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free…

2
Put Progress First

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…

3
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
4
Defend Your Vote

To oppose a Michigan ballot measure

5
Protecting Michigans Future Fund

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…

6
Michigan Citizens for Better Health

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…

7
Making Michigan Stronger

To research and promote issues concerning education, economic opportunity, individual freedoms and public policy within the state of michigan and to support activities and programs that improve the quality and effectiveness of local and…

8
Michigan Courage Fund

To promote civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of and visitors to the State of Michigan; to support public policies on the federal, state, and local levels that will bring about…

9
Elevated Voices Inc

Voter education around policy

10
Prosperity Michigan Inc

Prosperity michigan is the nonpartisan voice advocating for economic growth and opportunity for all michiganders, we make a pro-opportunity agenda front and center with elected officials, candidates, and voters by mobilizing citizens as a…

11
Making Government Accountable
Philanthropy
12
Jobs for Michigan

Clean Jobs for Michigan is building a future we can all be proud of. Through advocating for clean water clean energy and good-paying clean jobs were working to build a Michigan that will sustain our natural resources and hardworking…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Values and the most unlike its peers is The Empowerment Plan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FUND GRACE FUND — $100,000 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FUND GRACE FUNDMICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE — $100,000 · OtherMICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEEBuilding a Better Economy — $50,000 · OtherBuilding a Better EconomyAccountability for Government Fund Inc — $50,000 · OtherAccountability for Government Fund IncMichigan Values — $50,000 · OtherMichigan ValuesGreat Lakes Works — $25,000 · OtherGreat Lakes Works+4 more — $40,000 · Other+4 moreMICHIGAN EMPOWERMENT FUND — $300,000 · Public BenefitMICHIGAN EMPOWERMENT FUNDTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $50,000 · Human Services
Other$415,000Public Benefit$300,000Human Services$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMICHIGAN EMPOWERMENT FUND — $300,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FUND GRACE FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetBuilding a Better Economy — $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAccountability for Government Fund Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMichigan Values — $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMOVING MIDMICHIGAN FORWARD — $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetFIGHTING FOR A BETTER MICHIGAN FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMichigan Jobs Coalition — $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk PoolsMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools · Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn · Michigan Energy First · Sports Betting Alliance · Citizens for Energizing Michigan's Economy

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Michigan Citizens for Better Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2125

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph