Skip to content

Michigan · Public charity

Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to the State of Michigan; to support public policies on the federal, state, and local levels, that will bring about civic betterments and social improvements to Michigan residents;…

$104k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$60k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 7
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$76k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving2$60k50%
FY20233$83k100%
FY20227$94k86%
FY20213$35k67%
FY20201$10kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$204kEmployment$32kPhilanthropy$25kYouth Development$11kHuman Services$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Accountability for Government Fund Inc$77,50025%
Great Lakes Jobs Alliance$32,00022%
Michigan Democratic State Central Committee$30,0001n/a
Making Michigan Stronger$25,00014%
Road to Michigan's Future$20,00020%
Building a Better Economy$15,00011%
Great Lakes Strong$10,5001n/a
Michigan Empowerment Fund$10,00011%
Preserve Michigans Future Fund$10,00011%
Grand Rapids Area Community Engagement Fund Grace Fund$10,00015%
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Accountability for Government Fund Inc$77,50025%
Great Lakes Jobs Alliance$32,00022%
Michigan Democratic State Central Committee$30,0001n/a
Making Michigan Stronger$25,00014%
Road to Michigan's Future$20,00020%
Building a Better Economy$15,00011%
Great Lakes Strong$10,5001n/a
Michigan Empowerment Fund$10,00011%
Preserve Michigans Future Fund$10,00011%
Grand Rapids Area Community Engagement Fund Grace Fund$10,00015%
Parsnip 121 Fund$10,0001n/a
Michigan Values$6,00010%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($25k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAccountability for Government Fund Inc: $77,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetGreat Lakes Jobs Alliance: $32,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMaking Michigan Stronger: $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetRoad to Michigan's Future: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBuilding a Better Economy: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMichigan Empowerment Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPreserve Michigans Future Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGrand Rapids Area Community Engagement Fund Grace Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetMichigan Values: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers AssnMI24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn · Citizens for Energizing Michigan's Economy · Michigan Energy First · Michigan Citizens for Better Health · Michigan Health Leadership Fund · Sports Betting Alliance · Michigan Health & Hospital Association Dba Mha · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools?

Find your warmest path to Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools

How much does Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools give?
Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools reported 2 itemized grants totaling $60,000, out of $104,100 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 7 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Public Benefit (72%), Employment (11%), Philanthropy (9%).
Who are Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Accountability for Government Fund Inc ($78k), Great Lakes Jobs Alliance ($32k), Michigan Democratic State Central Committee ($30k).
Does Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn, Citizens for Energizing Michigan's Economy, Michigan Energy First.
Where is Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools based?
Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coalition to Promote Public Entity Risk Pools’ filings →

More from the funding graph