How much did MICHEL & CLAIRE GUDEFIN grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of MICHEL & CLAIRE GUDEFIN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $6k
$10k–50k6 grants · $99k
$50k–250k5 grants · $550k
$250k+2 grants · $900k

$55,000

Median grant

States reached

$31M

Total assets

Largest grants

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$400,000
LEARN2EARN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$175,000
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE$140,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$95,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$85,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$55,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$30,000
PREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA$25,000
APIFERA FARM INC$12,000
ABILIS$12,000
NAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
KREMPELS CENTER$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.2M · 16 repeat orgs$641k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against -50% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.2M

$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%

-50%

Still filing today

56%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $606k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RC
ROTARY CLUB OF NAPLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $765k · revenue +44% · 55% of their budget
SM
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE
8× · 2018–2025 · $675k · revenue +273%
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS
8× · 2018–2025 · $545k · revenue +52%

Funded once

GS
GREENWICH SPANISH SCHOOL
one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -70%
UU
US UKRAINIAN ACTIVISTS INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +205%
SJ
ST JOHN THE EVENGELIST CATHOLIC CHURCH
one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Naples Players Inc

The naples players mission is to build community through exceptional access to the power of theatre.

Arts & Culture

Guardian Angels of Naples

—

St Nicholas Home

Not for profit serving the elderly population

Human Services

Gfwc Naples Woman's Club Inc

To enhance the community through philanthropic activities and volunteer services

Community Improvement

Jupiter Medical Center Inc

To deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve.

Health

Naples Historical Society Foundation Inc

Naples historical society foundation, inc. exists to support naples historical society, inc., a nonprofit dedicated to preserving naples history.

Arts & Culture

Nicholas Pet Haven

Animals

A Forever Home Animal Rescue Inc

We rescue abandoned, injured, abused dogs from high kill shelters, strays and owner surrenders. They are given medical treatments, socialized and made ready for adoption to their forever home. We have rescued thousands in the 12 years…

Animals

Pet Rescue Miami Inc

Animals

Happy Acres Pet Rescue

Animals

Hollys Hope of North Port Incorporated

Education

Nantucket Safe Harbor for Animals Inc

The mission of nantucket safe harbor for animals, nisha, is to provide shelter and care for animals in need and to promote welfare through humane education, outreach and advocacy.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is St Matthews House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

11/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$6,564,500Housing & Shelter$1,220,000Human Services$1,191,000Health$841,500Philanthropy$40,000Animals$6,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MICHEL & CLAIRE GUDEFIN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROTARY CLUB OF NAPLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 271405132 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROTARY CLUB OF NAPLES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 55% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Michel & Claire Gudefin?

Find your warmest path to Michel & Claire Gudefin through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MICHEL & CLAIRE GUDEFIN

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Michel & Claire Gudefin?

More from the funding graph

MICHEL & CLAIRE GUDEFIN

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Michel & Claire Gudefin?

More from the funding graph