Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael Zelman Charitable Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$863
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$200
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$16kRecreation & Sports$8kInternational$3kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$2kAnimals$226Crime & Legal$175Food & Nutrition$75Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50
Median grant
5
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIFT OF LIFE LOS ANGELES$200
SAVE THE CHILDREN$100
Individual grant recipient$100
PROJECT HOPE$85
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$70
SD RESCUE MISSION$54
SPCA$50
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$50
CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL$44
PETA$35
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$25
ASPCA$25
TOYS FOR TOTS$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $370) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NO LIMITS LEARNING CENTER: $185 → 10%NO LIMITS LEARNING CENTER: $185 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
OH
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 15 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$26k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+16%

Still filing today

33%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $265 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHARLEY HOFFMAN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +34%
  • NL
    NO LIMITS LEARNING CENTER
    2× · 2019–2021 · $370 · revenue +162%
  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $278 · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • IR
    INT'L RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • WC
    WEINGART CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $650
  • UC
    UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
American Academy of Pediatrics

The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…

Health
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
United States Fund for Unicef

The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…

International
10
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charley Hoffman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIFT OF LIFE LOS ANGELES: $14,850 · OtherGIFT OF LIFE LOS ANGELESINT'L RELIEF FUND: $2,500 · OtherINT'L RELIEF FUNDBREATH OF LIFE CLASSIC: $1,575 · OtherBREATH OF LIFE CLASSICSTILLPOINT FAMILY RESOURCES: $925 · Other+20 more: $3,691 · Other+20 moreCHARLEY HOFFMAN FOUNDATION: $6,500 · Recreation & SportsCHARLEY HOFFMAN FOUNDAT…CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $278 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $125 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $85 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70 · InternationalUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50 · HealthNO LIMITS LEARNING CENTER: $370 · Human Services+1 more: $12 · Human ServicesFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $50 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $25 · Food & NutritionTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50 · AnimalsMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $25 · Philanthropy
Other$23,541Recreation & Sports$6,500International$558Health$550Human Services$382Food & Nutrition$75Animals$50Philanthropy$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLEY HOFFMAN FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO LIMITS LEARNING CENTER: $370 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $278 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $85 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $12 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLEY HOFFMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
  • Who funds NO LIMITS LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael Zelman Charitable Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael Zelman Charitable Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael Zelman’s filings →

More from the funding graph