· Private foundation
Michael Chernow Trust FBO Charity C-2
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ISLANDERS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| MADISON SQUARE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
Save The Children Federation Inc2× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +21%- PEPEF Endowment Fund4× · 2018–2021 · $17k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS YESHIVAT BIRKAT MOSHE5× · 2017–2021 · $7k · revenue -85%
Funded once
- SISalk Instituteone grant, 2019 · $25k
- PFPKD Foundationone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -15%
- JWJOHN W NICK FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $6k · 25% of their budget
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
The national center for jewish film is a unique, independent nonprofit motion picture archive, distributor, resource center and exhibitor. ncjf's ongoing mission is the collection, preservation and exhibition of films with artistic and…
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.
Yivo's mission is to study the thousand-year history of jewish life in eastern europe and russia in all its aspects: language, history, religion, folkways and material culture. yivo's archive and library preserves a significant collection…
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds PKD Foundation ↗
- Who funds ISLANDERS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Madison Square Boys and Girls Club Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS YESHIVAT BIRKAT MOSHE ↗
- Who funds JOHN W NICK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds THE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Michael Chernow Trust FBO Charity C-2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael Chernow Trust FBO Charity C-2. Bigger dots raise more.
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Michael Chernow Trust FBO Charity C-2?
Find your warmest path to Michael Chernow Trust FBO Charity C-2 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Michael Chernow Trust FBO Charity C-2’s filings →