Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael B Morrow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$277kYouth Development$152kFood & Nutrition$83kHuman Services$60kRecreation & Sports$47kCrime & Legal$35kHealth$35k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$6,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TWEZIMBE AFRICA INC$22,500
MYFRIENDS FOUNDATION$20,000
LUTHERAN OUTDOORS MINISTRY OF TEXAS INC$6,500
MOBILE LOAVES AND FISHES INC$6,500
PARTNERS IN HOPE$6,500
STEAMBOAT TRAINING ADAPTIVE RECREATIONAL SPORTS$5,500
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK INC$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $900 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$655k · 10 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +83% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$655k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+83%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TWEZIMBE AFRICA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $169k · revenue +191%
  • PD
    PASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK
    3× · 2017–2019 · $57k · revenue +118%
  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +320%

Funded once

  • HF
    HCC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • HA
    HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lone Star Legal Aid

Lone star legal aid's ("lsla") mission is to protect and advance the civil legal rights of the millions of texans living in poverty by providing free advocacy, legal representation, and community education that ensures equal access to…

Crime & Legal
2
Texas Legal Services Center Inc

Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…

Crime & Legal
3
Furnishing Families of Texas Dba Furnishing Families International

Christian organization serving under-resourced families including single parents, refugees, and immigrants by providing spiritual and financial assistance.

Human Services
4
Austin City Lutherans

Address food and housing insecurity for Austin-area low income families.

Religion
5
Lake Travis Crisis Ministries

Meet the short-term needs of people in crisis situations by providing immediate help in the form of food & financial assistance. Long-term assistance may also be provided.

Human Services
6
Christ Together Greater Austin

Ctga is a partnership of pastors and churches seeking to demonstrate and communicate the love of god to the people of greater austin by ensuring that every man, woman, and child has repeated opportunities to see, hear, and respond to the…

Education
7
Feeding America Texas

Feeding America Texas operates exclusively for charitable purposes by supporting food assistance, hunger relief, and community aid initiatives for individuals and families experiencing food insecurity throughout Texas. The organization…

Food & Nutrition
8
Gods Pantry

God's Pantry exists to extend a helping hand, to the needy, by providing food to anyone who is facing circumstances beyond their control. The pantry serves all people, with respect and compassion, allowing them to maintain their…

Food & Nutrition
9
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
10
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
11
Legal Aid of Northwest Texas

Ensure equal access to justice and improve the lives of low-income communities by providing high-quality legal representation, strategic litigation, valuable legal advice, and meaningful collaborations, outreach, and community education.

Crime & Legal
12
The a Partners Dba the Antioch Partners

To send out followers of jesus to participate in god's mission in the world. we are committed to inviting people to follow jesus, social justice and establishing worshipping communities among unreached and least-reached peoples throughout…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Loaves & Fishes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Steamboat Adaptive Recreational Sports. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TWEZIMBE AFRICA: $169,350 · InternationalTWEZIMBE AFRICAPASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK: $56,530 · InternationalPASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORKMYFRIENDS FOUNDATION: $152,080 · OtherMYFRIENDS FOUNDATIONPARTNERS IN HOPE: $51,175 · OtherPARTNERS IN HOPEHCC FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherHCC FOUNDATIONMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $54,215 · ReligionMOBILE LOAVES & F…LUTHERAN OUTDOORS MINISTRY OF TEXAS INC: $51,075 · ReligionLUTHERAN OUTDOORS…Steamboat Adaptive Recreational Sports: $47,300 · Recreation & SportsGREATER WACO LEGAL SERVICES: $35,475 · Crime & LegalCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $28,950 · Food & NutritionHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15,000 · HealthTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $8,800 · Human Services
International$225,880Other$223,255Religion$105,290Recreation & Sports$47,300Crime & Legal$35,475Food & Nutrition$28,950Health$15,000Human Services$8,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTWEZIMBE AFRICA: $169,350 over 7y, 18% of budgetPASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK: $56,530 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $54,215 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN OUTDOORS MINISTRY OF TEXAS INC: $51,075 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSteamboat Adaptive Recreational Sports: $47,300 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER WACO LEGAL SERVICES: $35,475 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $28,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $8,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TWEZIMBE AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds PASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN OUTDOORS MINISTRY OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Steamboat Adaptive Recreational Sports ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WACO LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael B Morrow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael B Morrow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michael B Morrow Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Michael B Morrow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael B Morrow’s filings →

    More from the funding graph