Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael and Jill Mitchell Charities

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$18kRecreation & Sports$12kEducation$5kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$1kFood & Nutrition$1kYouth Development$535Public Benefit$380Other$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$44k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO$6,993
CYSTIC FIBROSIS AWARENESS FOUNDATION$2,000
UGIFT$1,200
ASSIST THE OFFICER$1,000
A WARRIORS TABLE$1,000
GRATEFUL AMERICAN CHARITY$1,000
CALEB'S LEGACY OF LOVE$510
CR BUYERS GROUP$500
NAVY SEAL DANNY DIETZ FOUNDATION$180
WALLER MASONIC LODGE #808$150
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$139
PAYPAL GIVING FUND$132
RAISE-365$107
THE SILVER KNIGHT FUN RUN$100
TOMBALL HIGH SCHOOL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Veterans Airlift Command: $2k → 11%GRATEFUL AMERICANS CHARITY: $10k → 9%GRATEFUL AMERICAN CHARITY: $1k → 9%GRATEFUL AMERICANS CHARITY: $1k → 9%Assist the Officer: $3k → 16%ASSIST THE OFFICER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NV
NJ
VA
KS
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 5 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$29k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+35%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GRATEFUL AMERICANS CHARITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +27%
  • HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +22%
  • AT
    Assist the Officer Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • VA
    VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +2%
  • 5E
    529 Education Contribution - Grace
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • 5E
    529 Education Contribution - James
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Troops First Foundation Incorporated

To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…

Public Benefit
2
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
3
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
4
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
5
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
6
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
7
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
8
Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
9
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
10
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Awareness Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRATEFUL AMERICANS CHARITY: $12,136 · Human ServicesGRATEFUL AMERICANS CHARITYAssist the Officer Inc: $4,449 · Human ServicesAssist the Officer IncVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $1,675 · Human ServicesVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMANDHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $11,761 · Recreation & SportsHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO…+1 more: $243 · Recreation & SportsUGIFT: $1,200 · OtherUGIFT529 Education Contribution - Grace: $1,200 · Other529 Education Contri…529 Education Contribution - James: $1,000 · Other529 Education Contri…529 Education Contribution - Thomas: $1,000 · Other529 Education Contri…529 Education Contribution - Ella K: $1,000 · Other529 Education Contri…CALEBS LEGACY OF LOVE: $510 · OtherCALEBS LEGACY OF LOV…NAVY SEAL DANNY DIETZ FOUNDATION: $380 · Other+10 more: $1,072 · Other+10 moreCYSTIC FIBROSIS AWARENESS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthA Warriors Table: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCR BUYERS GROUP: $500 · Youth DevelopmentKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $69 · EducationPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $75 · Philanthropy
Human Services$18,260Recreation & Sports$12,004Other$7,362Health$2,050Food & Nutrition$1,000Youth Development$500Education$144Philanthropy$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRATEFUL AMERICANS CHARITY: $12,136 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $11,761 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAssist the Officer Inc: $4,449 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS AWARENESS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $1,675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Warriors Table: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCR BUYERS GROUP: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $243 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $69 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRATEFUL AMERICANS CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC ↗
  • Who funds Assist the Officer Inc ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS AWARENESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND ↗
  • Who funds A Warriors Table ↗
  • Who funds CR BUYERS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael and Jill Mitchell Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael and Jill Mitchell Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michael and Jill Mitchell Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Michael and Jill Mitchell Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael and Jill Mitchell Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph