Loading…
· Private foundation
MHA FOUNDATION INC
The mission of the organization is to promote rural health and education for members of the rim country communities through programs, activities, grants, and scholarships.
$385k
Granted FY2025
26
Grants
4
Communities
$172k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of MHA FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
scholarshippayson youthyouth footballmulti-universityfinancial aid
2021
rotarychristianrescue
2022
district
2023
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 26 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $168k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $172k
$3,580
Median grant
4
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
- RIM COUNTRY EDUCATION ALLIANCE SLE$172,294
- EASTERN ARIZONA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC$37,660
- VARIOUS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS 5000$35,156
- TIME OUT INC$30,000
- PAYSON HIGH SCHOOL$19,416
- FRIENDS OF RIM COUNTY GCC INC$18,000
- ASPIRE ARIZONA FOUNDATION$17,700
- NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION$10,000
- EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$7,640
- RIM COUNTRY MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION$5,000
- MARINE CORPS LEAGUE$5,000
- CLUB PAYSON VOLLEYBALL$4,000
- NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY$3,580
- RVN3 FOUNDATION$3,000
- HOME RUN FOR VETS$3,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 28 repeat orgs$688k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +136% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
28
43
Total granted
$1.5M
$404k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+136%
-16%
Still filing today
32%
19%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationCrime & LegalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $157k · revenue +220%
- AAASPIRE ARIZONA FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +168% · 53% of their budget
- TOTIME OUT INC2× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +136%
Funded once
- VCVARIOUS COMMUNITY FAMILIES ORGANIZAone grant, 2023 · $213k
- PFPAYSON FIRE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2022 · $50k
- PRPAYSON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Southern Arizona Arts & Cultural Alliance
A non-profit organization dedicated to the preservation, expansion and creation of Arts and Culture in Southern Arizona.
Philanthropy
2
Pro-Choice Arizona
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Health
3
Arizona Wins
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans.
Civil Rights
4
Arizona Foundation for Women
To advance the status of arizona's women through research, advocacy and philanthropy to ensure their safety, health and economic independence. this includes performing the functions of, or carrying out the purposes of the arizona community…
Human Services
5
Arizona Latin-American
Unclassified
6
Asu Enterprise Partners
Organization's missionasu enterprise partners serves as the resource-raising arm of arizona state university. as the parent organization of five nonprofits that are each tasked with identifying new revenue opportunities, asu enterprise…
Education
7
Sun Angel Foundation
Positively represent arizona state athletics & provide communication & services to all constituents. raise private financial support for student-athlete welfare issues & athletic facilities for asu.
Philanthropy
8
Arizona Christian University
Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence. arizona christian university exists to…
Education
9
Center for the Future of Arizona
Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.
Community Improvement
10
Tucson Museum of Art
The tucson museum of art and historic block connects art to life through meaningful, engaging experiences that inspire discovery, spark creativity, and promote cultural understanding.
Arts & Culture
11
Arizona State University Foundation for
The asu foundation for a new american university is a private, nonprofit organization that raises and manages private contributions to support the work of arizona state university.
Education
12
Arizona Community Foundation
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Canyon University and the most unlike its peers is National Forest Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,811,880Health$158,106Education$141,317Housing & Shelter$37,500Recreation & Sports$31,699Human Services$10,600Crime & Legal$1,250Arts & Culture$250
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE ARIZONA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EASTERN ARIZONA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TIME OUT INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RVN3 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA TOWN HALL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Arizona Community FoundationAZ16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MHA FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ASPIRE ARIZONA FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 464130332 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ASPIRE ARIZONA FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Mha Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mha Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines