Skip to content

· Private foundation

Merryman Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$285kArts & Culture$67kHuman Services$59kPhilanthropy$34kReligion$31kYouth Development$27kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION$20,000
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$5,000
LYNCHBURG COMMUNITY TRUST$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS$3,000
CVCC$3,000
V-COM$2,500
THE NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL$2,500
SKELTON 4H EDUCATIONAL CENTER$2,500
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$2,500
CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO$2,000
CASA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA$2,000
RUSTBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
HARMONY DAYCARE$2,000
LYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOL EDUCATION FND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%HUMAN KIND: $2k → 8%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 13%BEACON OF HOPE: $2k → 13%BEACON OF HOPE: $2k → 13%BEACON OF HOPE: $2k → 13%BEACON OF HOPE: $2k → 13%BEACON OF HOPE: $2k → 13%BEACON OF HOPE: $2k → 13%BEACON OF HOPE: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 41 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
9

Total granted

$461k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+14%

Still filing today

39%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +287%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • CC
    CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +399%

Funded once

  • TN
    TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • LU
    LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lynchburg Covenant Fellowship Incorporated

Provision of safe and affordable housing.

—
2
Virginia Lutheran Homes Inc

Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.

—
3
Lynchburg Baptist Retirement Community Llc

To provide "dignity in living" for senior adults who reside in this planned services community.

Housing & Shelter
4
Louisville Collegiate School

Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.

Education
5
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
6
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
7
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
8
Washington University of Virginia

Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs

—
9
Central Virginia Foundation for Economic Education&Improvement Inc

Furtherance of economic growth, education, training and development

—
10
New Schools for Virginia

New schools for virginia works with parents, students, educators and the community to improve educational outcomes by designing new schools and by supporting existing schools to improve outcomes.

Education
11
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
12
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Beacon of Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LYNCHBURG COMMUNITY TRUST: $30,000 · OtherLYNCHBURG COMMUNITY TRUSTCVCC: $27,000 · OtherCVCCIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherZION METHODIST CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherRUSTBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherHOLIDAY LAKE 4-H CENTER: $15,000 · OtherCENTER FOR THE ARTS AT VT: $15,000 · OtherLYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOL EDUCATION FND: $14,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $13,500 · OtherCENTRA HOSPICE: $12,500 · OtherV-COM: $12,500 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $11,500 · Other+25 more: $124,200 · Other+25 moreVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURGLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $7,500 · Education+3 more: $11,000 · Education+3 moreCAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $18,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS: $18,000 · Human ServicesBEACON OF HOPE INC: $10,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureCampbell County Historical Society Inc: $9,000 · Arts & CultureCASA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC: $14,500 · Civil RightsGREATER LYNCHBURG HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $6,500 · Housing & ShelterMIRIAM'S HOUSE INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $9,000 · Youth Development
Other$341,200Education$203,500Human Services$48,000Arts & Culture$31,500Civil Rights$14,500Housing & Shelter$12,500Youth Development$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 9y, 9.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC: $14,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $11,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCampbell County Historical Society Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD INC: $7,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LYNCHBURG HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $6,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRA HEALTH INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM HALL: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LYNCHBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIRON LIVES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYNCHBURG BEACON OF HOPE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG ↗
  • Who funds CAMPBELL COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Campbell County Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LYNCHBURG HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRA HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRIAM'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM HALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foster FoundationVA28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foster Foundation · Schewel Charitable Foundation · Easley Char Irr Tua 5019004715 · Centra Health Inc · Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation · The Al Stroobants Foundation · Valtim Family Foundation Inc · The Harry D Forsyth Foundation · Valentine Family Foundation · Carrington Family Foundation · M4k Lynchburg Inc · Moore's Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Merryman Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Merryman Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Merryman Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Merryman Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Merryman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph