Skip to content
Meriama Fund at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Meriama Fund

The Meriama Fund continues its outreach to provide funding for COVID relief in Nepal.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$184kArts & Culture$101kFood & Nutrition$26kAnimals$22kEducation$11k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $47,154, the rows itemized in this filing. The $121,244 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $74,090 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Himalayan Foundation$22,000
The Fund for the Tiger$10,000
Sarah Bush Dance Project$10,000
International Crane Foundatio$5,154
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The Fund for the Tiger: $10k → 8%Sarah Bush Dance Project: $10k → 10%UC San Francisco: $11k → 10%Snow Lion Foundation: $112k → 17%International Crane Foundatio: $5k → 9%Sarah Bush Dance Project: $10k → 10%American Himalayan Foundation: $22k → 10%Snow Lion Foundation: $29k → 17%Golden Gate Audubon Society: $7k → 10%American Himalayan Foundation: $11k → 10%American Himalayan Foundation: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $74k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$74k · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: Education · Healthcare · Infrastucture

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$272k · 3 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$272k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+461%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    Tibet Fund Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $141k · revenue +109%
  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $89k · revenue +43%
  • TA
    The American Himalayan Foundation
    3× · 2019–2025 · $43k · revenue -35%

Funded once

  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +39%
  • SB
    Sarah Bush Dance Project
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • US
    UC San Francisco
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Tibet Fund Inc: $140,770 · InternationalTibet Fund IncThe American Himalayan Foundation: $43,000 · InternationalThe American Himalayan FoundationFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $88,700 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INCALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $26,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY C…Sarah Bush Dance Project: $12,000 · OtherSarah Bush Dance…UC San Francisco: $11,000 · OtherUC San FranciscoTHE FUND FOR THE TIGER: $10,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $5,154 · AnimalsGolden Gate Bird Alliance Prev Golden Gate Audubon Society Inc: $6,500 · Environment
International$183,770Arts & Culture$88,700Other$49,000Animals$15,154Environment$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTibet Fund Inc: $140,770 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $88,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Himalayan Foundation: $43,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR THE TIGER: $10,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetGolden Gate Bird Alliance Prev Golden Gate Audubon Society Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $5,154 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Meriama Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Meriama Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Meriama Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Meriama Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Meriama’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home