Skip to content

· Public charity

Mercy Housing California

The mission of MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA is to directly facilitate the provision of affordable housing to families, seniors, people with special needs, homeless and potentially homeless individuals who would otherwise lack the financial resources to obtain quality, safe housing.

$7.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$62MPhilanthropy$11MHealth$10MCommunity Improvement$6.8MRecreation & Sports$5.5MHuman Services$1.0MArts & Culture$633kEmployment$350kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $710k
  • $250k+6 grants · $6.7M
$139,681
Median grant
2
States reached
$272M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 89 LP$4,031,720
MERCY HOUSING INC$1,130,131
KELSEY CIVIC CENTER LP$500,000
LAGUNA SENIOR HOUSING LP$448,134
THIRD AND LECONTE ASSOCIATES LP$324,806
55 LAGUNA LP$304,994
SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY$150,000
833 BYRANT LP$141,443
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO$139,681
SUNNYDALE AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER$79,900
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 51 LP$74,797
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 59 LP$74,093
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM INC$50,000
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA XXXV LP$40,001
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA XIV LP$24,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BAYVIEW HUNTER'S POINT YMCA: $111k → 10%J&J COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERLEANDREW JENKINS: $19k → 12%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $52k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Mercy Housing California’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 63%.

Mercy Housing Californialessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70M · 22 repeat orgs$28M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
42

Total granted

$70M
$24M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+6%

Still filing today

45%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MERCY HOUSING INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $26M · revenue +55%
  • MH
    MERCY HOUSING CALWEST
    2× · 2017–2020 · $15M · revenue +49% · 62% of their budget
  • MP
    MERCY PROPERTIES I INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3.1M · revenue +211% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • 1M
    1064 MISSION LP
    one grant, 2023 · $6.6M
  • TP
    TAHANANTIPPING POINT EQUITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5.4M
  • CG
    CALWEST GP MISSION BAY BLOCK 6
    one grant, 2022 · $3.4M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oceana Senior Housing Corporation

To own and operate oceana terrace, a 42-unit apartment project in pacifica, california, specially designed to meet the housing and service needs of low-income elderly and handicapped persons

—
2
Mercy Gardens

Own and operate a 23-unit apartment project known as mercy gardens, inc. located in san diego, california, providing housing and services for persons with aids

Housing & Shelter
3
Mercy Housing California

The mission of mercy housing california is to directly facilitate the provision of affordable housing to families, seniors, people with special needs, homeless and potentially homeless individuals who would otherwise lack the financial…

Housing & Shelter
4
San Juan Housing Corporation

The purpose of san juan housing corporation is to manage or direct entities which are organized for the purpose of creating stable, vibrant and healthy communities by developing, financing and operating affordable, program-enriched housing…

Housing & Shelter
5
South of Market Mercy Housing

The organization invests in limited partnerships which provide low- income housing and supportive services to low-income, homeless, potentially homeless, or otherwise disadvantaged persons, in accordance with its exempt purpose. most…

—
6
Mercy Housing Management Group

The mission of mercy housing management group is to provide property management services for properties serving families, seniors, and people with special needs who lack the economic resources to access quality, safe housing opportunites.…

Human Services
7
Mercy Bond Properties Colorado I

Mercy bond properties colorado i was organized on april 3, 2001 as a california nonstock, nonprofit corporation for the purpose of constructing and operating rental housing projects under section 202 of the national housing act. such…

Housing & Shelter
8
Mutual Housing Management

To be an exceptional steward of the portfolio of multifamily housing owned by mutual housing california and other 501(c)(3) entities (or limited partnerships in which a 501(c)(3) entity is a general partner) to support long-term…

Housing & Shelter
9
Mercy Properties Washington

To provide low-income persons, homeless, and potentially homeless persons or otherwise disadvantaged persons with housing facilities and educational and supportive services

Housing & Shelter
10
Sky Parkway Mutual Housing Corporation

To provide affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
11
Mercy Community Capital

The mission of mercy community capital is to provide below-market loans in order to support affordable housing developments when conventional financing is not possible or affordable. developers and nonprofit organizations seeking loans…

Housing & Shelter
12
St Mary's Housing Corporaton
Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Housing Calwest; the most unlike its peers is Bothin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

1064 MISSION LP: $6,578,127 · Other1064 MISSION LPCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO FINANCE CORPORATION: $5,539,681 · OtherCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO FINANCE CORPORATIONTAHANANTIPPING POINT EQUITY: $5,405,858 · OtherTAHANANTIPPING POINT EQUITYSYCAMORE STREET: $4,902,197 · OtherSYCAMORE STREETMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 89 LP: $4,031,720 · OtherMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 89 LPMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 87 LP: $4,030,219 · OtherMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 87 LPCALWEST GP MISSION BAY BLOCK 6: $3,400,000 · OtherCALWEST GP MISSION BAY BLOCK 6LAGUNA SENIOR HOUSING LP: $1,900,120 · OtherMERCY MORGAN DEVELOPMENT GP: $1,854,270 · Other+43 more: $13,187,350 · Other+43 moreMERCY HOUSING INC: $25,652,942 · Housing & ShelterMERCY HOUSING INCMERCY HOUSING CALWEST: $14,850,809 · Housing & ShelterMERCY HOUSING CALWESTMERCY PROPERTIES I INC: $3,108,196 · Housing & ShelterMERCY PROPERTIES I INC+8 more: $2,259,776 · Housing & ShelterSUNNYDALE AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER: $988,987 · Recreation & SportsYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $163,005 · Human ServicesJ&J Community Resource Center: $19,000 · Human ServicesHomes for San Diegans: $50,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $30,000 · Community ImprovementSAMOAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $28,000 · Community ImprovementTHE KRESGE FOUNDATION: $85,250 · PhilanthropyHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $50,000 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $33,000 · Youth Development
Other$50,829,542Housing & Shelter$45,871,723Recreation & Sports$988,987Human Services$182,005Community Improvement$108,000Philanthropy$85,250Health$50,000Youth Development$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY HOUSING INC: $25,652,942 over 5y, 16% of budgetMERCY HOUSING CALWEST: $14,850,809 over 2y, 62% of budgetMERCY PROPERTIES I INC: $3,108,196 over 2y, 32% of budgetKELSEY: $1,500,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetSUNNYDALE AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER: $988,987 over 3y, 100% of budgetMERCY PROPERTIES CALIFORNIA: $175,944 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $163,005 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY HOUSING WEST: $98,856 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMOLINE MINISTRIES 2 INC: $91,463 over 1y, 23% of budgetPADUCAH MINISTRIES I INC: $90,488 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetTHE KRESGE FOUNDATION: $85,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY OAKS VILLAGE: $82,266 over 1y, 16% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIN HOUSING CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHomes for San Diegans: $50,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $33,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOTHIN FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAMOAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $28,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWHEATLAND DUPLEXES CORPORATION: $21,706 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetJ&J Community Resource Center: $19,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCOUNTRYWOOD HOUSING CORPORATION F/K/A KENNETH ARMS HOUSING CORPORATION: $7,615 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING CALWEST ↗
  • Who funds MERCY PROPERTIES I INC ↗
  • Who funds KELSEY ↗
  • Who funds SUNNYDALE AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SFHA HOUSING CORPORATION MAMADOU GNING ↗
  • Who funds MERCY PROPERTIES CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING WEST ↗
  • Who funds MOLINE MINISTRIES 2 INC ↗
  • Who funds PADUCAH MINISTRIES I INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KRESGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCY OAKS VILLAGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mercy Housing IncCO13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mercy Housing Inc · The San Francisco Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mercy Housing California funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mercy Housing California. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mercy Housing California’s filings →

    More from the funding graph