Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mercy Health Fort Smith Communities

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

$470k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$588kHealth$436kPhilanthropy$419kCommunity Improvement$339kHuman Services$219kArts & Culture$137kRecreation & Sports$40kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $390,399 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $470,042 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $79,643 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $213k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT SMITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS$100,500
UNITED WAY$62,750
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC$50,000
FORT SMITH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$35,000
U S MARSHALS MUSEUM$25,000
SUBIACO ABBEY$20,000
CANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATION$20,000
ARKANSAS HOSPITAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH TRUST$17,649
UAFS FOUNDATION$15,000
GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC$12,500
AR COLLEGES OF HEALTH ED$12,000
RMHC OF ARKOMA$10,000
FORT SMITH SYMPHONY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE PACK SHACK: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 65% of Mercy Health Fort Smith Communities’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in AR; read by stated purpose it is 58% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Mercy Health Fort Smith Communitieslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 10 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$2.1M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+2%

Still filing today

70%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF FORT SMITH AREA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $419k · revenue +12%
  • FS
    FORT SMITH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $314k · revenue +159%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $246k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • PP
    PARK PARTNERS OF FORT SMITH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -74%
  • TP
    THE PACK SHACK
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +2%
  • HC
    HAMILTON CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc

To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education

Health
2
Fort Smith Chamber Educational Development Foundation Inc

Recruitment of jobs and capital investment in fort smith, ar

Community Improvement
3
Fort Wayne Medical Society Inc

The fort wayne medical society is committed to the goals of the american medical association, the purpose of which is the preservation of the art and science of medicine, personal development of member physicians and protection and…

4
Arkansas Medical Society

Collects member dues which are used to advance medical knowledge, elevate the standards of medical education, and secure enactment and enforcement of just laws relating to the field of medicine.

Health
5
Arkansas Methodist Medical Center Foundation

To provide funds in the form of gifts, grants and services to arkansas methodist medical center and other charitable organizations in furtherance of their charitable and scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
6
Michigan State Medical Society Foundation

To advance the field of health for the public good.

7
North Arkansas Medical Foundation

The foundation's mission is to encourage public support for the activities and purpose of north arkansas regional medical center.

Philanthropy
8
Smith County Medical Society

Maintain a professional society of physicians.

9
University of Ar Ft Smith Foundationinc

To benefit and carry out purposes of the university of arkansas at fort smith

Education
10
Arkansas Pharmacy Foundation

Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.

Health
11
Fort Morgan Community Hospital Asso

To provide a hospital facility and to make upgrades to the hospital facility so that it may provide primary and emergency care to the citizens of the community.

Health
12
Fort Smith Art Center Inc

The fort smith art center is established to foster art appreciation in the community through diverse exhibitions, educational programming, dynamic events, and cultural partnerships.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDonald House Charities of Arkoma Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fort Smith Public Schools — $530,000 · OtherFort Smith Public SchoolsFORT SMITH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $313,712 · OtherFORT SMITH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCECHAPAHEART — $209,233 · OtherCHAPAHEARTCANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH — $65,500 · Other+3 more — $53,649 · OtherUNITED WAY OF FORT SMITH AREA INC — $419,250 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF FORT SM…GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC — $245,933 · HealthGOOD SAMARIT…FORT SMITH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $136,600 · Arts & CultureUS MARSHALS MUSEUM INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationARKANSAS COLLEGES OF HEALTH EDUCATION — $34,000 · EducationSUBIACO FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationPARK PARTNERS OF FORT SMITH INC — $15,000 · Community ImprovementTHE PACK SHACK — $10,750 · Human ServicesHAMILTON CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,252,094Philanthropy$419,250Health$245,933Arts & Culture$161,600Education$104,000Community Improvement$15,000Human Services$10,750Crime & Legal$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF FORT SMITH AREA INC — $419,250 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetFORT SMITH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $313,712 over 7y, 10% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC — $245,933 over 7y, 16% of budgetFORT SMITH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $136,600 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS COLLEGES OF HEALTH EDUCATION — $34,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Arkoma Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSUBIACO FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARKANSAS HOSPITAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH TRUST INC — $17,649 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPARK PARTNERS OF FORT SMITH INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTHE PACK SHACK — $10,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAMILTON CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Mercy Hospital Fort Smith · Arvest Foundation · Maurras Family Charitable Trust · Walter O Caldwell Foundation · William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy Foundation · The Degen Foundation · The Griffin Charitable Organization · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mercy Health Fort Smith Communities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mercy Health Fort Smith Communities?

    Find your warmest path to Mercy Health Fort Smith Communities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph