Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mercury Wire Products Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$80kEducation$38kHuman Services$20kYouth Development$18kHousing & Shelter$18kCommunity Improvement$7kPhilanthropy$6kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$525k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DARE MASSACHUSETTS$4,000
ABBY HOUSE$3,000
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$3,000
YOU INC$2,500
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION$2,500
NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
FESTIVAL OF GIVING TREES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TARENTINO CHARITABLE FUND$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS$1,000
LEICESTER SENIOR CENTER$1,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$513
SEVEN HILLS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%LIVING IN FREEDOM TOGETHER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 26 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
16

Total granted

$186k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+25%

Still filing today

38%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +136%
  • AO
    ALS ONE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +95%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $10k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • CC
    CUMBERLAND COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • FH
    FIRST HELP INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
2
Lovelace Biomedical & Environmental Research Institute Inc

Lberi's mission is to serve humanity through research on the prevention, treatment, and cure of respiratory disease and support the research and efforts of lbri.

—
3
Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc

The boston area rape crisis center (barcc) works to end sexual violence through healing and social change. as the only rape crisis center in greater boston and one of the nation's oldest, barcc provides free, inclusive, empowerment-based…

Health
4
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
5
Head for the Cure Foundation

The mission of the head for the cure foundation (hftc) is threefold: to build awareness, raise funding, and inspire hope for the community of brain cancer patients, their families, friends, caregivers and other supporters, while…

Health
6
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
7
The Mccourt Foundation Inc

Striving to help cure neurological diseases, while empowering communities to build a healthier world.

Philanthropy
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
Massachusetts Biomedical Initiatives Inc

Massachusetts biomedical initiatives, inc. ("mbi or the organization") is a private non-profit corporation focusing on building up central massachusetts as a global biomanufacturing hub. our mission of being a partner for fostering…

Science & Tech
10
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
11
Health Assessment Lab Inc

1) development & validation of new measures 2) translation & adaption of tools for use in international research 3) technical assistance in support of patient -based tools in a variety of specific applications 4) education & training in…

Health
12
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dare Massachusetts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DARE MASSACHUSETTS INC: $26,000 · OtherDARE MASSACHUSETTS INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOU INC: $10,000 · OtherYOU INCUNIVERSITY OF CUMBERLAND: $7,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CUMBERLANDBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $7,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF CENTAL MA: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherFESTIVAL OF GIVING TREES: $6,000 · OtherNAATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER SOCIETY: $5,250 · OtherWORCESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER SOCIETY: $5,000 · Other+25 more: $42,227 · Other+25 moreLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $23,500 · HealthLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FO…ALS ONE INC: $12,850 · HealthALS ONE INCTHE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthINTERISE INC: $7,350 · Community ImprovementVETERANS INC: $4,000 · Community ImprovementROSIE'S PLACE INC: $9,850 · Housing & ShelterOperation Second Chance Inc: $6,500 · Public BenefitHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSAFE EXIT INITIATIVE (SEI) INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$137,977Health$37,850Community Improvement$11,350Housing & Shelter$9,850Public Benefit$6,500Human Services$4,500Food & Nutrition$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDARE MASSACHUSETTS INC: $26,000 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $23,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALS ONE INC: $12,850 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $9,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERISE INC: $7,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $3,077 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST HELP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE EXIT INITIATIVE (SEI) INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DARE MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALS ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERISE INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE EXIT INITIATIVE (SEI) INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The White Companies Charitable Trust · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mercury Wire Products Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mercury Wire Products Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Veterans Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Als One Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mercury Wire Products Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mercury Wire Products Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mercury Wire Products’ filings →

More from the funding graph