Skip to content

· Private foundation

Menachem & Ahuva Shabat Family Foundation INC

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2023
27
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Religion$3.4MScience & Tech$534kHealth$415kPhilanthropy$184kHuman Services$164kEducation$48kYouth Development$20kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$18,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$354k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHASDEI SHIMON Inc$280,000
NER NAFTALI INC$210,000
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH$200,000
MIDWEST REFUAH HEALTH CENTER$200,000
CCK FOUNDATION$169,999
CHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL Inc$100,000
BAIS CHAIM DOVID EAST$79,460
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF Yeshivas NESIVOS AHRON$60,000
TELSHE YESHIVA - CHICAGO$50,000
CHICAGO PURIM FUND$50,000
CP FUND$50,000
RABBI'S FUND$47,500
TORAH UMESORAH$18,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$18,000
CHICAGO CHESED FUND$17,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NALEH INC: $5k → 11%LIBENU FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $30k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $30k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $29k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $28k → 14%CHICAGO CHESED FUND: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 14 repeat orgs$706k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$4.0M
$303k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+6%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $404k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BAIS CHAIM DOVID EAST
    5× · 2019–2023 · $955k
  • YD
    YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH
    3× · 2020–2023 · $700k
  • CS
    CHASDEI SHIMON INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $453k

Funded once

  • M
    MADRAIGOS
    one grant, 2019 · $43k
  • Y
    YTT
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • FA
    FANATICS ALL IN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maot Chitim of Greater Chicago Inc

Maot chitim of greater chicago provides meaningful opportunities, through the delivery of food and other necessities, to help those in need celebrate jewish life with dignity and joy.

Food & Nutrition
2
Kehillah Jewish Education Fund

Make an authentic jewish education, coupled with an excellent secular education, available and affordable to all jewish families in the chicagoland community.

Education
3
Yedidim Usa Inc

Helping jewish community with rent, utilities, repairs, ect.

Human Services
4
Jewish Free Loan Chicago Inc

Jewish Free Loan Chicago helps Chicagoans discover small personal loans with zero-interest in an effort to cut out the need for predatory lending, often in the form of risky payday loans and car title loans.

Human Services
5
Chabad of River North and Fulton Market

Chabad of River North and Fulton Market is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and chartable needs of the Jewish Community and /or of the neighbors of River North and Fulton Market.

Religion
6
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
7
Chasdei Eliyahu

Our mission is to provide assistance to indigent jewish families in the form of food, medicical assistance, clothing and crisis management.

Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
9
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
10
Iggud Menahalei Yeshivos Inc

Promote jewish religious observance and studies of jewish texts among children.

Religion
11
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
12
Yeshivas Nachlas Bnei Shimon

To provide financial assistance to jewish educational and charitable causes.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Chesed Fund; the most unlike its peers is Hatzalah Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAIS CHAIM DOVID EAST: $955,192 · OtherBAIS CHAIM DOVID EASTYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $700,000 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAHCHASDEI SHIMON INC: $453,000 · OtherCHASDEI SHIMON INCCHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC: $440,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS AHRON: $255,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS AHRONNER NAFTALI INC: $228,000 · OtherNER NAFTALI INCCCK FOUNDATION: $169,999 · OtherRABBI'S FUND: $167,500 · Other+27 more: $482,100 · Other+27 moreMIDWEST REFUAH HEALTH CENTER: $400,000 · HealthMIDWEST R…HATZALAH CHICAGO: $15,000 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $72,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS NESIVOS AHRON C/O MICHAEL FRIEDMAN: $60,000 · PhilanthropyCP FUND: $50,000 · PhilanthropyFANATICS ALL IN FOUNDATION: $34,729 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $133,500 · Human ServicesLIBENU: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesAGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS: $34,900 · ReligionBais Yaakov High School of Chicago: $20,000 · ReligionMAALOT: $12,000 · ReligionLIMUDEI DA'AS INC: $10,000 · ReligionPENIMI INC: $21,000 · EducationARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,850,791Health$415,000Philanthropy$216,729Human Services$163,500Religion$76,900Education$21,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDWEST REFUAH HEALTH CENTER: $400,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $133,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $72,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS NESIVOS AHRON C/O MICHAEL FRIEDMAN: $60,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS: $34,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFANATICS ALL IN FOUNDATION: $34,729 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIBENU: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPENIMI INC: $21,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBais Yaakov High School of Chicago: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP MATZIV INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHATZALAH CHICAGO: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMAALOT: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIMUDEI DA'AS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNALEH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDWEST REFUAH HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHESED FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS NESIVOS AHRON C/O MICHAEL FRIEDMAN ↗
  • Who funds CP FUND ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds FANATICS ALL IN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIBENU ↗
  • Who funds PENIMI INC ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov High School of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MATZIV INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MAALOT ↗
  • Who funds LIMUDEI DA'AS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL44.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Yeshivas Kesser Yonah · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Pharmore Drugs Charitable Foundation · Alice G Hanson Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Lakewood Cheder School Inc · Sidney and Lisa Glenner Foundation · Lev Zahav NFP

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Menachem & Ahuva Shabat Family Foundation INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Menachem & Ahuva Shabat Family Foundation INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Menachem & Ahuva Shabat Family Foundation INC?

    Find your warmest path to Menachem & Ahuva Shabat Family Foundation INC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Menachem & Ahuva Shabat Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph