Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melvin a Lipsitz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$105kHealth$62kPhilanthropy$37kEducation$15kArts & Culture$13kAnimals$7kReligion$5kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPRIGHT AFRICA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $50k → 17%THE TOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION - TEXAS CHAPTER: $4k → 8%BRAZOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $750 → 16%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $500 → 19%THE JEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND: $1k → 19%THE TOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION - TEXAS CHAPTER: $2k → 8%BRAZOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%THE TOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION - TEXAS CHAPTER: $2k → 8%THE MOLLY MARTINSEN FOUNDATION: $250 → 16%THE TOURETTE ASSOCIATION - TEXAS CHAPTER: $2k → 8%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY - PRO TEXANA SOCIETY: $2k → 16%THE TOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION - TEXAS CHAPTER: $1k → 8%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $3k → 16%KEEP WACO BEAUTIFUL: $50 → 16%WACO FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%THE CAMERON PARK ZOOLOGICAL AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $5k → 16%THE CAMERON PARK ZOOLOGICAL AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $2k → 16%TEMPLE RODEF SHOLOM: $2k → 16%URJ GREEN FAMILY CAMP: $1k → 16%URJ GREEN FAMILY CAMP: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 7 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$123k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+87%

Still filing today

71%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    UPRIGHT AFRICA INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue -41%
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF WACO & CENTRAL TX
    4× · 2017–2022 · $37k · revenue -11%
  • CS
    CHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2022 · $12k

Funded once

  • WF
    WACO FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CREATIVE WACO
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -3%
  • SP
    ST PAULS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historic Waco Foundation Inc

To collect, maintain, preserve, publish and interpret the heritage and history of waco, mclennan county, texas

Arts & Culture
2
Waco Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Collaborative Inc

Start up waco is a texas nonprofit organization formed via collaboration of cross-sector partnerships that aspire to lead waco's entrepreneurial support efforts and elevate waco as a hub for business innovation.

Community Improvement
3
Festival On the Brazos

Festival on the brazos is a non-profit volunteer organization that promotes the unique spirit of waco by sharing waco's history, providing educational scholarships, and creating community-minded connections.

Arts & Culture
4
The Museum of North Texas History

To collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history of the North Texas Area to inspire an interest in the past for the education and enrichment of people of all ages.

Arts & Culture
5
Waco Cultural Arts Fest

To engage and enrich our community by providing outstanding arts programming and cultural activities that inspire creativity and participation.

Arts & Culture
6
Texas Association of Museums

The Texas Association of Museums strengthens the Texas museum community through collaborations, connections, professional development, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
7
Waco Civic Theatre

The mission of the waco civic theatre, a non-profit organization, is to provide the heart of texas community with quality live theatre, to create an outlet for community education and participation in all aspects of productions, and to…

Arts & Culture
8
Waco Historical Society

Preserve the aviation history of the weaver aircraft company

—
9
Texas Jewish Security Initiative
Crime & Legal
10
Weslaco Museum of Local History and Cultural Art

The organization's mission is to collect, preserve, exhibit and promote the history, cultural arts, and past traditions of weslaco, texas, and its surrounding region.

—
11
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cameron Park Zoological & Botanical Society; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPRIGHT AFRICA INC: $55,000 · InternationalUPRIGHT AFRICA INCJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $50,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) I…WACO FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherWACO FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATIONCHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL: $11,500 · OtherCHRISTCHURCH SCHOOLTourette Syndrome Association of Texas: $9,000 · OtherTourette Syndrome Association of Texas+10 more: $13,750 · Other+10 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF WACO & CENTRAL TX: $37,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…CREATIVE WACO: $12,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureCAMERON PARK ZOOLOGICAL & BOTANICAL SOCIETY: $7,400 · AnimalsKEEP WACO BEAUTIFUL INC: $50 · Environment
International$105,000Other$84,250Philanthropy$37,000Arts & Culture$13,250Animals$7,400Environment$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPRIGHT AFRICA INC: $55,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF WACO & CENTRAL TX: $37,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetCREATIVE WACO: $12,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTourette Syndrome Association of Texas: $9,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCAMERON PARK ZOOLOGICAL & BOTANICAL SOCIETY: $7,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBrazos Education Foundation Inc: $1,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEEP WACO BEAUTIFUL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPRIGHT AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF WACO & CENTRAL TX ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE WACO ↗
  • Who funds Tourette Syndrome Association of Texas ↗
  • Who funds CAMERON PARK ZOOLOGICAL & BOTANICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH MUSEUM OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds WACO MAMMOTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEEP WACO BEAUTIFUL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Margaret Cb & S Spencer N Brown Foundation IncTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Margaret Cb & S Spencer N Brown Foundation Inc · Waco Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melvin a Lipsitz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melvin a Lipsitz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jewish Museum of Maryland Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Melvin a Lipsitz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph