Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melinda Gray Ardia Environmental Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Environment$16kEducation$11kRecreation & Sports$6kAnimals$5kScience & Tech$2kPhilanthropy$2k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$180k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sensory Gardens for Community Resilience$1,500
Jack Creek Preserve Foundation$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Save the River$1,500
Wild Apple Genetics Study$1,500
Save the Snakes$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,400
ADK Field Studies Program$955
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 77% of grant dollars ($30k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($9k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jack Creek Preserve Foundation: $2k → 10%Save the Snakes: $2k → 12%Erie County Soil and Water Conservation District: $2k → 10%Newark Central School District: $2k → 11%Save the River: $2k → 14%Green Heroes - Eco Scouts: $2k → 8%Angari Foundation: $2k → 11%Cedar Crest Camp: $2k → 15%Sensory Gardens for Community Resilience: $2k → 14%Bloomfield School District: $2k → 19%Big Life Foundation USA: $2k → 11%Pacific Mammal Research: $2k → 11%Wild Apple Genetics Study: $2k → 12%Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
NY
OH
CA
TN
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 23% of all-years giving ($9k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Bangladesh$2k · 1 grant
Kenya$2k · 1 grant
Venezuela$2k · 1 grant
Malawi$2k · 1 grant
Colombia$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Galapagos Whale Shark Project
—
2
Marine Conservation Science Institute
Philanthropy
3
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
4
Oceanit Research Foundation
Science & Tech
5
Idaho Wildlife Federation

The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.

Animals
6
Wilderness River Foundation
Youth Development
7
Intertribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council
—
8
Forever Our Rivers Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Clean Reefs
Environment
10
Sierra Streams Institute

To promote community stewardship and advance scientific knowledge of watersheds through reserarch, monitoring and education for the benefit of the Sierra Nevada region and beyond.

Environment
11
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
12
Interlaken Wildlife Foundation
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Life Foundation Usa; the most unlike its peers is Angari Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipientErie County Soil and Water Conservation District: $2,000 · OtherErie County Soil and Water Conservation DistrictBloomfield School District: $2,000 · OtherBloomfield School DistrictCivil Association Nucleo de Geografia Viv: $2,000 · OtherCivil Association Nucleo de Geografia VivPlant Conservation & Research Foundation: $2,000 · OtherPlant Conservation & Research FoundationTri-State Steelheaders: $2,000 · OtherTri-State SteelheadersIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,600 · OtherNEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTWild Apple Genetics Study: $1,500 · OtherWild Apple Genetics StudyIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSensory Gardens for Community Resilience: $1,500 · OtherSensory Gardens for Community ResilienceIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFundacion Magica Musica: $1,500 · OtherFundacion Magica MusicaADK Field Studies Program: $955 · OtherBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $2,000 · AnimalsBIG LIFE FOUND…Save the Snakes: $1,500 · AnimalsSave the Snake…JACK CREEK PRESERVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · AnimalsJACK CREEK PRE…Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences: $1,500 · Science & TechPACIFIC MAMMAL RESEARCH: $1,500 · Science & TechANGARI FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropySAVE THE RIVER INC: $1,500 · Environment
Other$28,105Animals$5,000Science & Tech$3,000Philanthropy$1,500Environment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTri-State Steelheaders: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave the Snakes: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJACK CREEK PRESERVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANGARI FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE THE RIVER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds Tri-State Steelheaders ↗
  • Who funds Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences ↗
  • Who funds Save the Snakes ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC MAMMAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds JACK CREEK PRESERVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGARI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE RIVER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melinda Gray Ardia Environmental Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melinda Gray Ardia Environmental Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Angari Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Melinda Gray Ardia Environmental Foundation Ltd?

Find your warmest path to Melinda Gray Ardia Environmental Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Melinda Gray Ardia Environmental Foundation Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph