Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melancon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$74kPublic Benefit$38kInternational$23kHuman Services$12kRecreation & Sports$11kEnvironment$5kArts & Culture$5kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$661
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN LEGION DELVIN ADAMS POST 315$5,000
LOUISIANA TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,500
HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL$3,000
NICHOLLS STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
GRAND ISLE FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
BLESS YOUR HEART$500
FLETCHER TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BLESS YOUR HEART: $6k → 17%BLESS YOUR HEART: $4k → 17%BLESS YOUR HEART: $560 → 17%BLESS YOUR HEART: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119k · 13 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -52% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

$119k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-52%

Still filing today

54%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOURCHON OILMAN'S ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $31k · revenue +49%
  • HL
    HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +90%
  • LE
    LAFOURCHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • LP
    LAFOURCHE PARISH ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • FO
    Friends of Bayou Lafourche Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -82%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Swamp Watch Inc

Educate public on special interest in Louisiana

Public Benefit
2
Bayou Research Institute
Crime & Legal
3
Bayou Community Foundation

Bayou Community Foundations strengthens Lafourche Parish, Terrebonne Parish and Grand Isle, LA through philanthropic leadership to create a vibrant and diverse community where all can thrive.

Community Improvement
4
Restore Grand Isle

To restore grand isle to the beautiful tourist area it once was

Recreation & Sports
5
Bogalusa Balloon Festival

public charity

Arts & Culture
6
Gueydan Duck Festival Association

Promote recreation, tourism and industry in the gueydan, vermilion parish, louisiana area

Community Improvement
7
Foundation for a Better Louisiana

Promote ideas for the betterment of louisiana that cut across political, social and ideological boundaries

Community Improvement
8
Louisiana Charter Boat Association Inc

To protect and promote the development and preservation of the fishing guide industry in LA and industries that support the fishing guide industry.

—
9
Orleans Sheriff's Office Foundation
Crime & Legal
10
Finding Our Roots

The celebration of African American History in the Louisiana Parishes of Terrebonne, Lafourche and St. Mary

Arts & Culture
11
Bayou Playhouse Inc

Schedule o

Arts & Culture
12
Land Trust for Louisiana

Land conservation

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bayou Civic Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fourchon Oilman's Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAFOURCHE PARISH ANIMAL SHELTER: $25,000 · OtherLAFOURCHE PARISH ANIMAL SHELTERSOUTH LAFOUCH HIGH SCHOOL: $11,367 · OtherSOUTH LAFOUCH HIGH SCHOOLNICHOLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,500 · OtherNICHOLS STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTERNATIONAL GRAND ISLE TARPON RODEO INC: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION DELVIN ADAMS POST 315: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF TARPON PRIDE: $4,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE: $3,500 · OtherLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · OtherLOUISIANA TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3,500 · Other+19 more: $13,100 · Other+19 moreFOURCHON OILMAN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $31,000 · EducationFOURCHON OILMAN'S ASSOCI…LAFOURCHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EducationLAFOURCHE EDUCATION FOUN…HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $23,000 · InternationalHUMAN LIFE INTE…Bless Your Heart Nonprofit Corporation: $11,710 · Human ServicesFriends of Bayou Lafourche Inc: $5,000 · EnvironmentCUT OFF YOUTH CENTER: $1,400 · Youth Development
Other$95,467Education$37,000International$23,000Human Services$11,710Environment$5,000Youth Development$1,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOURCHON OILMAN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $31,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBless Your Heart Nonprofit Corporation: $11,710 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetLAFOURCHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFriends of Bayou Lafourche Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GRAND ISLE TARPON RODEO INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLA 1 COALITION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUT OFF YOUTH CENTER: $1,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAYOU CIVIC CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOURCHON OILMAN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Bless Your Heart Nonprofit Corporation ↗
  • Who funds LAFOURCHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Bayou Lafourche Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL GRAND ISLE TARPON RODEO INC ↗
  • Who funds LA 1 COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds CUT OFF YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BAYOU CIVIC CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYOU REGION CRIME STOPPERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Danos FoundationLA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Danos Foundation · Community Foundation of Acadiana · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melancon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melancon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Melancon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph