Skip to content
Medical Society of Sedgwick County Physician Leadership Alliance Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Medical Society of Sedgwick County Physician Leadership Alliance Inc

To improve health and health care and to provide support for programs and studies to further said purposes.

$192k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$990kRecreation & Sports$180kEducation$8kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$6kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $175,585, the rows itemized in this filing. The $192,439 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,854 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $147k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$309k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOUBLE ARROW METABOLISM$96,085
KU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$50,550
Individual grant recipient$15,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$8,450
ARMBRUSTER CONSULTING LLC$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $294k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $78k → 16%KU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $77k → 16%KU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $71k → 16%KU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $51k → 16%KU SCHOOL OF PHARMACY: $6k → 16%KU SCHOOL OF PHARMACY: $6k → 16%KU SCHOOL OF PHARMACY: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$1.1M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+52%

Still filing today

43%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE- WICHITA MEDICAL PRACTICE ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $294k · revenue +22%
  • YF
    YMCA Foundation of Wichita Inc (2311-SO)
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue ×20 · 46% of their budget
  • CP
    CENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $41k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • WS
    WICHITA STATE INNOVATION ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +52%
  • KB
    KANSAS BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • HH
    HUNTER HEALTH CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +101%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
2
Kansas Hospital Association

The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.

—
3
Jefferson County Memorial Hospital Inc

Promote and provide quality healthcare for the general commuinty of Jefferson County

Health
4
University Health Physicians

University health physicians provides quality and compassionate healthcare in an environment of academic excellence.

Health
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
Konza Prairie Community Health Center Inc

Provide physician, dental and related healthcare services through clinics located in geary and riley county, kansas.

Health
8
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
9
Kansas Medical Society

To cultivate, promote,and disseminate knowledge and information concerning the medical profession and related subjects.

—
10
Kansas Health Science University Inc

Kansas Health Science University's mission is to provide access to osteopathic medical and other health sciences education and training through emphasizing opportunity, academic excellence, and community engagement.

Education
11
Nebraska Medicine

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and committees through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
12
Western Colorado Healthcare Alliance

To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hunter Health Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Medicine Lodge Community Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOUBLE ARROW METABOLISM: $475,534 · OtherDOUBLE ARROW METABOLISMCITY OF WICHITA: $180,000 · OtherCITY OF WICHITAYMCA Foundation of Wichita Inc (2311-SO): $60,000 · OtherYMCA Foundation of Wichita Inc (2311-SO)+11 more: $116,437 · Other+11 moreUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE- WICHITA MEDICAL PRACTICE ASSOCIATION: $293,898 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL…CENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $41,046 · HealthKANSAS HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK INC: $9,500 · HealthCoffeyville Regional Medical Center Inc: $5,400 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthWICHITA STATE INNOVATION ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · Education
Other$831,971Human Services$293,898Health$56,946Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE- WICHITA MEDICAL PRACTICE ASSOCIATION: $293,898 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYMCA Foundation of Wichita Inc (2311-SO): $60,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetCENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $41,046 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWICHITA STATE INNOVATION ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK INC: $9,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDICINE LODGE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $6,800 over 1y, 26% of budgetCoffeyville Regional Medical Center Inc: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental of Kansa…United Way of the Pla…
Delta Dental of Kansas IncKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Kansas Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Medical Society of Sedgwick County Physician Leadership Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Medical Society of Sedgwick County Physician Leadership Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Medical Society of Sedgwick County Physician Leadership Alliance Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Medical Society of Sedgwick County Physician Leadership Alliance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $65k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Medical Society of Sedgwick County Physician Leadership Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home