Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mead Witter Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6.8M
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$6.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$7.1MPhilanthropy$6.6MArts & Culture$69kHuman Services$35kEnvironment$5kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.6M
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chicago Community Foundation$6,600,000
National Merit Scholarship Corporation$70,870
Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin$34,659
Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation, Inc. - Radio$15,000
Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation, Inc. - TV$15,000
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee$12,000
Arts Council of South Wood County, Inc.$3,000
Historic Point Basse, Inc.$3,000
Wisconsin Rapids Boxing Club$3,000
Trees for Tomorrow, Inc.$2,250
Wisconsin Rapids City Band, Inc.$2,000
Friends of Rapids Music, Inc.$600
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

2%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 5 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$241k
$6.9M

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    National Merit Scholarship Corporation
    2× · 2021–2022 · $152k · revenue +18%
  • WP
    Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation, Inc. - TV
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k
  • WP
    Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation, Inc. - Radio
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents/UW-Madison
    one grant, 2021 · $6.9M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents/UW-Madison: $6,948,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin System Board of Regents/UW-MadisonCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,600,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+7 more: $92,600 · OtherNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $152,080 · EducationVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $34,659 · Human ServicesTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $5,250 · EnvironmentARTS COUNCIL OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$13,640,600Education$152,080Human Services$34,659Environment$5,250Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $152,080 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $34,659 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $5,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin ↗
  • Who funds TREES FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC POINT BASSE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mead Witter Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mead Witter Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $87k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mead Witter’s filings →

More from the funding graph